New update of the first generations pre-war TV
Introduction
One of the childhood memories I have is on the home-built television receiver of my father Piet Hooijmans. A large (and heavy!) grey metal box with a very small picture screen. I must have been 5 years old, when on a Saturday afternoon around 1963 my father switched on the television set. I vividly remember images of a horse race, probably at nearby Duindigt in Wassenaar. It was the last time I've seen the set working, but it has always been carefully preserved. Later when I studied electronics myself I opened it once in a while, but never had the time nor the means to dive into it. It has always fascinated me. Now I have the time. The first thing that triggered me was the exotic EQ40 valve of which my father always talked about as the "enneode". This has resulted in my page on the history of the EQ40/EQ80.
Next I wanted to trace back the history of the home-built TV itself, although I was hampered by a severe lack of information about it. When starting to dive into the Internet I quickly discovered that the home-built set was tightly linked to the development of the first televisions in general, and that the activity of the Radiobuizen Lab where Piet Hooijmans worked had an important influence on the direction of these developments. The intended story on his home-built TV thus quickly became the integral story of the development of the first televisions at Philips. Or at least an effort to reconstruct it, since it is a much more complex story than it may seem. It will involve multiple departments, multiple standards, multiple models and valve choices, official prototypes, in-official do-it-yourself models, and the first commercial products. It is a reconstruction based on available data, which at least on the level of actual television sets and valves is very extensive thanks to forums like Radiomuseum.org, the Nederlandse Forum voor Oude Radios, UK Vintage Radio and others. And although my friend Ronald Dekker has already done a lot of pre-work on the internal Philips organisation at the time for his EF50 story, there are still many gaps related to the internal Philips activities. My analysis, which now roughly covers the period 1935-1958, is thus also based on my interpretation of facts and developments, and consequently a "living story" since never complete nor 100% correct. At the same time it is a "story in development", since I continue to receive fresh inputs that help to fill in the gaps. In this context especially the extensive knowledge and the rare collection of first generation TV's of Jac Janssen has been of tremendous value. |
Chapter navigation
|
The first electronic Television standards, 1935-1940
1936 was the year that a number of new standards were introduced. In the US RCA launched a 343-line system, which was used for limited field trials in New York (transmitting from the Empire State Building), Philadelphia and Los Angeles. Germany used the 1936 Berlin Olympic Games to demonstrate its half-electronic 180-line standard, using intermediary film rolls which were then electronically scanned for transmission. In parallel experimental transmissions were made using the new 375-line all-electronic system, using the new Telefunken Iconoscope camera tube. In Berlin-Witzleben a first transmitter station was installed, transmitting a 42,9MHz picture carrier. Using long distance cable of the Reichspost the signal was also distributed to major cities across Germany for local transmission. After the Games transmissions continued, with viewing rooms in post offices. During the 1936 RadiOlympia consumer electronics show in London, the BBC started test transmissions using both the Baird 240-line film-transfer semi-electronic and Marconi-EMI 405-line electronic systems, which were transmitted alternately. In November 1936 the BBC started official transmissions from the Alexandra Palace transmitter, still using both standards during different hours. But the trials were very conclusive, and January 1937 the BBC stopped the 240-line system and switched to the 405-line standard that would remain the British TV standard until the mid 1960s.
|
The next step was again made by RCA, which launched a 441-line standard in 1937 based on the earlier 343-line field trials in LA. By 1938 commercial sets were brought to the market and in 1939 a major official launch was made during the New York World's Fair. Almost the moment it was launched in the US, in 1937, Germany adopted it, albeit at the 25Hz frame rate, although it took till 1938 to have real transmissions. The Nazi regime saw television as a powerful propaganda tool and stimulated a broad roll-out, for which they forced the joint German set makers to develop the Einheitsfernsehempfanger E1 (standard TV receiver), the same approach as the Volkswagen car. Volume roll out of the set was stopped due to the outbreak of war, though, in September 1939. The 441-line standard was also adopted by Italy and Russia, the latter based on an exchange with RCA of TV equipment. France in the meantime made a step to high quality television by launching a 455-line system, using a 30kW transmitter on the Eiffel Tower in Paris. However, available sets were expensive, and when transmissions stopped at the outbreak of war in September 1939 there were only 300 sets in use. Although the transmitters were destroyed before the evacuation of Paris in June 1940, the occupying German forces re-installed a transmitter, but now based on the German 441-line system. It started transmitting in 1943, and when later that year the German transmitting station in Berlin was destroyed by Allied bombing, the Paris transmitter was for a year the only TV transmitter in Europe. To close the pre-war overview, where the European countries all stopped TV development due to the outbreak of war, the still neutral US continued its path towards commercial TV broadcast. In 1939 the National Television Standardisation Committee (NTSC) was established. After quite some evaluation, lobbying and politics it decided for a 525-line standard, with as main innovation the use of Frequency Modulated (FM) audio, allowing a much better sound quality. It was officially announced as the US standard in March 1941, but after Pearl Harbour and entry of the war the US Government forbid all effort on commercial TV, also bringing US TV developments to an effective stop. Nevertheless the 525-line NTSC became the only TV transmission standard that was formally still alive at the end of the war, and as such became a reference point for many post-war developments.
|
Most remarkable in all this is that already in 1937 Philips demonstrated an experimental TV system (from camera to transmitter and receiver) at 567 lines, higher than any other European or US system. Despite the use in the Television Caravan touring the capitals of Europe, not much publicity was given to this record-breaking system. But it is interesting to see how these Philips television devlopments fitted in the global efforts to roll out television broadcast.
Overview of the TV broadcast standards used between 1935 and 1941. Only (semi)-electronic standards actually used for formal (test) transmissions are listed. In the column "Sound carrier" parallel refers to systems with sound transmission and reception independently. Positive sound carrier distance refers to sound above picture carriers, negative sound-below-picture.
Pre-War Philips Television activities, 1935-1939
Where was Philips in all this? Clearly the company was not a leading player, although active in all countries mentioned above. Between 1935 and 1939 Philips Gloeilampenfabrieken (Incandescent Lightbulb Factories), as it was officially called, was already active in promoting and demonstrating television, although these activities were rather limited. Philips Research was in principle the centre for new developments with the magnitude of television. As so often, it started early; already in 1928/29 ir Druyvesteyn developed a From the beginning, however, the general enthusiasm for television within the Philips Research management was lukewarm at best. In this period television was only a research activity, and thus driven by the Natuurkundig Laboratorium (NatLab) at the Strijp complex in Eindhoven. Especially its emblematic director Prof.Dr. Gilles Holst (1886-1968) didn't see the need for or potential of television, where his main arguments against it were a lack of programs and the size of a television set with an acceptable screen diameter. On the latter point it is fair to say that cathode ray tubes at the time were still fairly narrow, typically 22cm screen diameters, although 30cm tubes existed. The problem was especially the then limited deflection angle, which would give on extrapolation enormous picture tubes for larger screen sizes. It was therefore decided that at least the Philips television receivers were to be based on rear projection systems. So despite the reservations, activities continued.
|
The Philips 180-line Television set, 1935
Within Philips, the first serious management discussions on television took place in July 1934, triggered by the iconoscope camera development at RCA and the fact that Telefunken and EMI, major competitors, had taken over this concept. Van der Pol and van der Mark, who had made a trip to the US in the spring of 1934 and had visited RCA, reported on the advanced and rapid developments there. And so the creation of a 180-line television system was started, following the latest German standard. The first element was the television receiver set development, which started towards the end of 1934 at the NatLab Research Laboratory.
In February 1935 Philips issued a press release, which was reported in multiple Dutch, German, and Austrian newspapers (De Telegraaf, Radio Exprerss, Funk, Helios), which stated the following [translated Helios article on the right]:
Philips builds a television receiver From the Netherlands comes the news that in the Philips Research Lab cathode ray display tubes have been developed, with which recently television receivers have been built with very good results. In the coming days Philips engineers will perform receiver experiments in combination with the Berlin UKW transmitter. Other news from Hamburg indicates that in Germany, where as we know television broadcast has reached a high level, Philips will also participate in this domain: the X-ray tube company C.H.F. Müller, mother company of the Valvo valve factory, who is connected to Philips, is already for some time involved in the development of video display tubes, and for some time has a established a television laboratory, with the objective to develop television receivers. CHF Müller in Hamburg, mentioned in the article, was in fact fully owned by Philips since 1926, although, as so often in the case of Philips acquisitions, it continued to use its original company name. The products produced by this subsidiary were the Valvo components, mostly electron tubes. The article suggests that the electrostatic cathode ray tubes developed in the NatLab were taken into production by Müller under the Valvo brand. Although information is still scarce, the press announcement suggest that the first TV receiver was a NatLab development with involvement of the new Müller Hamburg TV-lab. My assumption is that the electronics were developed in Eindhoven, and then transferred to Hamburg where the latest CRT was added and the cabinet designed around the set. Although it can not be verified, sources state that 5 sets of this 180-line TV were built. |
Obviously, Philips had designed a receiver compliant with the then most advanced television standard that was actually being transmitted: the 180-line system with its Berlin-Wirzleben transmitter. During the spring of 1935 Philips therefore took the set to Berlin to perform receiver measurements. Apparently these were successful, since in April and May most Dutch newspapers reported [De Locomotief, May 13, 1935]:
A test system in Eindhoven. Related to the reception tests in Berlin with a Philips television receiver, we hear, that the results were satisfactory in all aspects. It is therefore the company intention to start performing television demonstrations in the Netherlands shortly. The Philips receiver will be characterised by sharp and clear pictures. It was almost certainly after these successful field tests that Philips decided to demonstrate the set at the next Berlin Funkausstellung in 1935, and this was probably then also the moment that the Hamburg lab built a nice looking wooden cabinet around the receiver frame. And indeed it was presented at the Berlin fair, as one of a growing number of (German) producers showing a television set. After the coming to power of Hitler's NSDAP in 1933, this was the first Funkausstellung where the Nazi's enforced a common German industrial approach under the motto "Volkssender!, Fernsehen!, Volksemfänger!" (People's transmitter, Television, People's receiver!), and all television sets were presented in a single Fernsehstrasse (Television road). This included Telefunken, Lorenz, Loewe, Tekade, Fernseh, and Philips. It is highly likely that the set was presented as being from the company CFH Müller instead, because this what this first set is always called. I can imagine that with the Nazi NSDAP increasingly taking control of the German economy and industry, Philips headquarters opted for downplaying its role, content to let it be seen as a purely German (Hamburg) activity. The 1935 Funkausstellung seems to have been a big success for the promotion of television, even though it suffered a massive fire in the TV transmitter hall. |
|
The next question is of course what type of TV electrical design this was. Here I had an unexpected stroke of luck! It was reported that at least one example survived in a Swiss private museum, the Musée Jurassien de la Radio of G. and N. Schnoebelen in Cornol, Switserland. A picture was known, on Early Television.org, of a Müller 180-line set in what seemed restored condition, and which must then be the only survivor of the original five sets. However, the museum closed in 2002, and most of the collection was, as I found out, bought by the Dutch former TV producer Harry de Winter who had the ambition of setting up a radio and TV museum himself. That plan evaporated with time, however, leaving the collection partly scattered and partly stored without any publicity on its whereabouts. I was thus very excited when I was contacted by Taco Vonk, supervisor of the collection, that he had the Philips 180-line set and whether I wanted to have a look and take pictures. A unique opportunity to stand eye to eye with the very first 85 year old Philips TV.
Although I've been able to take a number of close-up pictures, the frames in the TV are very difficult to access, only when the heavy three-level frame is extracted from the solid wooden cabinet would it be possible to view details like valve coding. Only a few of the valves could be identified and reflect the type of valves used: E499 oscillator triode, AF7 RF/IF pentode, AB2 detector, B-i pentode and AL4 power pentode. Based on similar exterior appearance I assume all power pentodes are AL4. The IF amplifier valve is the AF7 with top grid1 contact. Many of the IF amplifiers were in that case used in grounded grid configuration. Radiomuseum also mentions the 4673 pentode, 4686 gas-filled thyratron, and 1875 rectifier diode, all three of them Philips valves. In general it is likely, given that the set was designed end 1934, the AF7 and AL4 are replacement valves, and that the original design was based on the earlier 4000 series.
|
The central frame seems to contain the RF input. Since the input configuration is almost perfectly symmetrical with one heavily screened E499 triode, I interpret it that a single RF oscillator was used for independent mixing in two mixers, one each for video and audio. The antenna input then should have been connected directly to the two mixer inputs, meaning that the receiver Noise Figure and sensitivity will have been rather bad. The audio chain is then straightforward, with two IF amplifiers (AF7 or 4673, which look identically and are difficult to distinguish from each other), a peak detector, one AF amplifier and an AL4 power amplifier. On the lower front side of the cabinet is then a large speaker. The video chain is much more difficult to reverse engineer, so here is my best interpretation. On the IF chassis are three amplifiers, of which at least the first two with grounded grid, which suggests low gain to guarantee sufficient video bandwidth. This is in line with the claims in CHF Müller leaflets, where they claim a large IF bandwidth for high picture sharpness. The signal then moves to the top level synchronization and deflection chassis. This part of the chassis was very difficult to see, since hidden behind the woodwork, but it suggests another three IF amplifiers (so 6 in total!), an AB2 video detector and AL4 video amplifier. The leaflets claim a special control of the picture brightness, with independent setting of the dark and white limits in combination with so-called average current control. After that the sync separation, vertical and horizontal deflection are implemented very symmetrically. Since an electrostatic display tube is used, the vertical and horizontal deflection are first order identical, both served by what seems push-pull 2-step amplification. Finally there were three large rectifier diodes, in what seems to be two separate power supply chassis with two very large supply transformers. Apparently two existing power supplies were needed to provide power to the 32 (!) valves plus the display tube. This in turn strengthens the impression that this was a kind of "skunk" project, very opportunistically combining pieces of circuitry and/or making rather straightforward non-optimised new functions where required.
|
|
|
The display tube was an electrostatic tube, according to Radiomuseum the 3962. Cathode Ray Tubes (CRT) became a hot topic during the early 1930s, when especially Vladimir Zworykin of RCA demonstrated first television receivers using these tubes. Undoubtedly Philips started development of CRTs quickly after, at least in the Natlab Research organisation. But as we've seen higher up also the CFH Müller/ Valvo group in Hamburg worked on CRTs, while the same possibly happened at Mullard in the UK. All this led to different electrostatic CRT families, the origins of which are still not entirely clear:
- The 3961 and 3962, which were part of the larger 3950/60/70 family of electrostatic deflection CRTs. The 3950 and 3970 types were for oscilloscopes only, but the 3960s were labelled for both oscilloscopes and television. The 3961 had a 30cm screen, the 3962 a 22cm diameter. As said, Radiomuseum claims the latter was used in the Philips/Müller set, which is very likely given that the 3961 (76,5cm long!) appeared later, probably towards 1937/38. The screen colour of the 3962 was yellow-green. It required 2kV anode voltage.
- By 1936/37 Philips introduced a new naming convention for its Miniwatt valves, including the electrostatic CRTs. The 3951 thus became the DG16-1 (D= Electrostatic deflection, G= Green phosphors, 16= 16cm screen cross section), which is mentioned in the first TV-related Philips advertisement. Similarly the 3952 became the DB16-1, with a blue screen. (First screens only had green or blueish phosphors. The first white display, the DW25-1, only appeared in 1939). It seems that the 3962 was not renamed under the new scheme, suggesting that by then it was no longer in production.
- In 1937 Mullard, the Philips-UK brand, advertised the E46-12 12" (30cm) white CRT. Since Philips did not have white phosphors yet, it was likely a re-branded import tube from the US (probably RCA or GEC). Later the family was extended with magnetic deflection tubes too (M46-12 and -15).
All this leads to the interpreted block diagram shown below, undoubtedly not perfect but the best I can make of it now. But at the same time a major improvement in the level of knowledge on this extremely rare very first Philips television set.
A full chain television demonstration system, 1935
Following the successful Berlin field trials, the next trigger for action was the announcement of the BBC that they planned the construction of an experimental television transmitter in London (which became the Alexandra Palace site). Although Holst continued to resist, Loupard, the commercial member of the Board of Directors, demanded a similar Philips test transmitter. By April 1935 the order for constructing such a television transmitter was given and a broadly quote press release was issued:
In order to continue the laboratory trials on a larger scale, Philips will set up an experimental transmitter in Eindhoven, transmitting at a wavelength of around 7 meter. An experimental transmitter at 3 meter wavelength is already operational for some time. [De Locomotief 13-5-1935]
However, a transmitter without signals to transmit is useless, and the decision thus demanded the development of the complete television chain:
In order to continue the laboratory trials on a larger scale, Philips will set up an experimental transmitter in Eindhoven, transmitting at a wavelength of around 7 meter. An experimental transmitter at 3 meter wavelength is already operational for some time. [De Locomotief 13-5-1935]
However, a transmitter without signals to transmit is useless, and the decision thus demanded the development of the complete television chain:
- a television camera
- the transmitter
- a television receiver (the 180-line set described above)
Because it was so critical to the entire system, here a brief description of the Iconoscope. The first part of this device is a regular hot cathode electron beam generator with two-dimensional electrostatic deflection. With X and Y sawtooth scanning voltages identical to those in the display CRT, the electron beam scans the target plate P. This plate is formed from many small metal islands with photovoltaic characteristics, and each form a small capacitor with the backplate of P. Under scanning of the electron beam, all these islands charge to a maximum negative voltage. Now, when an optical image is projected on this plate as shown, the charged islands will start to discharge depending upon the amount of light they receive. The next time (after 1/25 seconds) the electron beam hits an island while scanning, it will be recharged to the maximum by the beam. This induces a small charging current through resistor R, which can be amplified for further processing. While scanning across the plate the output signals will thus be lines with intensity variations due to projected image.
The iconoscope was used in two different ways. To start it was the core of a first television camera developed at the NatLab, which at least from the exterior looked remotely like what became standard TV cameras later. It could rotate along two axes and had a manually operated zoom lens arrangement. The camera could be used for "live" images, but suffered from relatively low sensitivity, requiring special high pressure mercury lamps for proper lighting conditions.
The second application was the film scanner. Pre-recording of content could only be done on film, requiring film-to-electric transfer afterwards. (At the Berlin Olympics in 1936 all transmissions still required going through this film-to-TV transfer). It used a similar camera, but now in a fixed set up with a film projector. Lighting conditions were easier in this case, given the short distance and the ability to put a strong lamp behind the film. |
|
What remained to be done on the sender side was the RF transmitter. A signal generating unit had already created the two scanning voltages for line (4.500Hz) and frame (25Hz) frequencies, which were used in the iconoscope for the beam scanning. These two frequencies were converted into block-shaped signals, and combined to create the frame-line synchronisation composite signal. In a last step this composite synchronisation signal and the amplified video signal from the iconoscope plate were combined into a single composite video baseband signal that modulated an RF oscillator at 43,2MHz. This was almost certainly still a full dual sideband AM signal, since the need for bandwidth reduction using vestigial sideband transmission came only later. A transmitter antenna was installed on one og the highest buildings on the Eindhoven Strijp-S complex, adjacent to the Natlab Research buildings. Transmit power was modest at 400-500W. Although the actual video bandwidth was around 1MHz, it was claimed the transmit chain had a modulated bandwidth of 3MHz. A separate, more conventional, sound transmitter was also installed.
|
|
|
By October 1935 it was widely reported in the Dutch and Netherlands East Indies press that the transmitter had started operating, and on November 24 a first report on a full television demonstration system was published. December 1st, the Minister of the Interior de Wilde, the NOZEMA national transmitter board, and Radio Board visited Eindhoven for a demonstration, and were received by president Anton Philips, while van der Pol demonstrated the system. One of the highlights, claimed to be the first time at least in Europe, were outdoor recordings of some Philips employees playing soccer in one of the NatLab inner yards. Throughout December 1935 almost every self-respecting Dutch newspaper and magazine featured a large story on the Philips television demonstrations, mostly with the publicity pictures provided by Philips. All in all, between mid 1934 and end 1935 Philips made a serious step in developing elements of the entire television transmit and receive chain.
|
Philips Television from 180 to 405-lines, 1936
Once the entire 180-line system was up and running by the end of 1935, the next steps were to get involved in the race to better picture quality, or in other words a higher number of lines. It seems that with the right foresight both the transmitter and receiver systems had been defined to be flexible with respect to the line count, and once the wave of 180-line demonstrations was over the NatLab started work on higher line numbers. The first step was 240 lines, the system used briefly in the UK. By March 1936 the company achieved stable 360-line transmission and reception. The last jump was to the standards then launched in the main competing countries: 375 lines in Germany, and 405 lines in the UK. These were the systems that would be massively demonstrated at the RadiOlympia in London and the Funkausstellung in Berlin, both in September. Apparently the systems were both first tested with progressive scanning, and then finally, mid 1936, the move to interlaced scanning was made.
In 1936 Philips was present at both the Berlin Radio Show as well as the London RadiOlympia, where they seemed to have shown the same set. In Berlin all German TV makers were present: Telefunken, Fernseh, Philips, Loewe, Lorenz and Te-Ka-De. This was the set mounted in a Bauhaus-style metal tube frame, as confirmed by a picture in Wireless World. Information about the concept comes from the short description in Wireless World of September 4, 1936, which reports on the RadiOlympia exhibits:
"Direct vision is also adopted in the Philips receiver; the black-and-white picture measures 8,5" by 7". The vision receiver is a superheterodyne with an HF stage followed by a two-valve frequency-changer. Three stages of IF amplification are used before the detector, and there is one LF stage. Electrostatic deflection is employed, and the time bases are of the hard-valve type; three valves are used in each, and three rectifiers are used for the power supply. For sound reception an eight-valve superheterodyne is provided, covering the 7-metre band in addition to medium and long-wave bands".
Clearly the architecture of the 1936 model was completely different from the 1935 model, and the valve count seems to have reduced from the 32 for television only to 19 for the TV and nine for the radio, so in total 25. Based on the description and the practice continued with the 1937 and 38 sets, it is most likely that a TV audio IF chain was added to the standard radio. The "7-metre band" quoted in the Wireless World article means an audio RF of roughly 40-45MHz, which is indeed in the TV VHF-I broadcast band as used at the time.
Compared to the 1935 set, many optimizations had been implemented, especially in the video IF chain where the number of stages was reduced from 6 to 3. The addition of a real RF amplifier stage before the mixers will have improved the noise performance and sensitivity of the set considerably. Also the sync separation and deflection circuitry was substantially more efficient, with the number of valves reduced from 10 to 6. At the same time the display tube is still of the electrostatic type, almost certainly the same as used in the 1935 set. The mentioned rectangular screen size of 8,5 x 7", equivalent to 22 x 18cm indeed seems to be equivalent to a 30cm circular tube. Since the image is reported to be black-and-white, which was not yet available within Philips, this was likely the Mullard E46-12 imported tube.
"Direct vision is also adopted in the Philips receiver; the black-and-white picture measures 8,5" by 7". The vision receiver is a superheterodyne with an HF stage followed by a two-valve frequency-changer. Three stages of IF amplification are used before the detector, and there is one LF stage. Electrostatic deflection is employed, and the time bases are of the hard-valve type; three valves are used in each, and three rectifiers are used for the power supply. For sound reception an eight-valve superheterodyne is provided, covering the 7-metre band in addition to medium and long-wave bands".
Clearly the architecture of the 1936 model was completely different from the 1935 model, and the valve count seems to have reduced from the 32 for television only to 19 for the TV and nine for the radio, so in total 25. Based on the description and the practice continued with the 1937 and 38 sets, it is most likely that a TV audio IF chain was added to the standard radio. The "7-metre band" quoted in the Wireless World article means an audio RF of roughly 40-45MHz, which is indeed in the TV VHF-I broadcast band as used at the time.
Compared to the 1935 set, many optimizations had been implemented, especially in the video IF chain where the number of stages was reduced from 6 to 3. The addition of a real RF amplifier stage before the mixers will have improved the noise performance and sensitivity of the set considerably. Also the sync separation and deflection circuitry was substantially more efficient, with the number of valves reduced from 10 to 6. At the same time the display tube is still of the electrostatic type, almost certainly the same as used in the 1935 set. The mentioned rectangular screen size of 8,5 x 7", equivalent to 22 x 18cm indeed seems to be equivalent to a 30cm circular tube. Since the image is reported to be black-and-white, which was not yet available within Philips, this was likely the Mullard E46-12 imported tube.
The only remaining question is where this set was developed. A few observations on this:
- To start, it is unlikely it was a Research set, given the continued use of the 1935 set in all known NatLab demonstrations.
- The NatLab was rapidly switching to the new rear projection receiver concept and it is highly unlikely they had time for this parallel development.
- The exterior cabinet design is very much unlike the large wooden cabinets of the previous (1935) and upcoming Tel6 and Tel61 sets. This suggests a quite different source.
- Given the much more optimized electrical architecture (only 19 TV function valves) the Eindhoven Apparaten-lab could be an option, but then the exterior design is totally non-standard. Also, I have not found any reference to any television activities in the Apparaten-lab at this time.
The Philips TV demonstration caravan, 1937
In 1936 the commercial department of Philips revolted, triggered by the BBC announcement of experimental transmissions during the RadiOlympia show, and enforced a decision, overruling the head of Research Holst, that a more aggressive commercial approach should be taken by Philips in promoting television, with the aim of selling sets. To start it was decided that two demonstration caravans would be built for more aggressive promotion of television, each caravan consisting of two vans. These vans were built by a local company in Eindhoven, and called VW3 (Volgwagen, trailer). They were very similar to the vans built for the Dutch Army for telecommunication units. The first caravan was delivered by September 1937, and looked much more mature than the original 180-line system in the NatLab studio. Each caravan consisted of two vans, nr1 with all signal processing, nr2 with the transmitters. New moveable cameras were developed too, reportedly using the new Philips 5852 Iconoscope. Most of this equipment was developed by the NatLab groups. The large-screen rear-projection receivers in contrast, although supported by the group of Rinia, were a joint development of the Apparatenlab (Set Development, the group responsible for all radio, record player and now also TV development) and the Mitcham, UK-based Mullard Labs. These improved Tel6 receivers had already been shown at the 1937 RadiOlympia and will be discussed in the next section. The fist caravan was presented to the press on October 13, 1937, at the airfield Eindhoven-Welschap, where also the well-known series of publicity pictures were taken. The vans and system were described in an article in the Philips Technical Review of January 1938 by J. van der Mark.
|
Around the same time that the demonstration caravans were presented to the press, Philips issued a booklet explaining the system, and inviting the National Organisations in the respective countries to propose events were they system could be demonstrated. With respect to the first van nr1 it contained:
- the iconoscope camera and a microphone, with connecting cables of 40 meter each.
- the amplifier and control panel including the line and sync signal generators.
- a built-in film scanner device in a separate section of the van (accessible with a few steps but also a separate exterior door).
Van nr2 contained the two transmitters:
- the television video transmitter, at a wavelength of roughly 7m (42MHz), with a retractable 10m high antenna at the right aft corner of the van. Transmitted power of 50W. Maximum distance between the two vans was 80m.
- the television sound transmitter, at a wavelength of 6,75m (44,5MHz), with a retractable 10m high antenna at the left front corner of the van. Transmitted power of 50W.
- the remaining space in the van was used to store the camera plus 3-4 Tel6 TV receivers during transport.
(These were almost certainly the improved Tel6, electrically the Tel61 but in the Tel6 cabinet. During the 1937 RadiOlympia the Tel6 showed severe lifetime issues of the high intensity CRT tubes, which was solved in the Tel61).
One very interesting fact is given in the 1938 PTR publication. It literally says "The installation is suitable for the broadcasting of 25 pictures per second, with 405 or 567 lines per complete picture, while interlaced scanning is employed". This means that 8 years before the "formal" launch of the Philips 567-line standard, analysis of the optimal line versus cost trade-off had delivered this result, prototypes of this system had already been built. If true, it made Philips the pre-war record holder on the number of lines used in experimental TV! It is strange that no further publicity has been given to this, but apparently there were good reasons for not doing so. In practise, in the 1938-39 years Philips joined the 405-line camp, mainly driven by its UK activities that were the frontrunner in this domain.
For some reasons not yet entirely clear, Philips was forced to hold back on using the demonstration caravans. A planned demonstration in Groningen by J. van der Mark was cancelled last minute pn prders of the Dutch government! But January 38 they were finally "released" and the first caravan started touring Europe. The first system demonstration was on January 13 by caravan 1 in Bruxelles in the Philips Belgium headquarter building, including the Minister of P.T.T Mr. Bouchery. It showed the audience, apart from the mandatory speeches by dignitaries, a singing performance by Ms de Grave, first soprano of the Royal Muntschouwburg Opera, and a ballet performance by Ms Marthe Coeck, first dancer of the Royal Munt Theatre. This was to become typical for the show Philips put up in every city, using local celebrities to attract large audiences and a lot of publicity. It is interesting to see that the publicity stories were very ambivalent. On the one hand Philips was proud to present its new technology, but at the same a lot of hurdles were mentioned for full deployment: the need for many transmitters, given a typical range of 35km; the cost of the transmitter infrastructure, the cost of receivers, and the need for programs to be televised. All this because the main message was that people should first buy more Philips radios, before worrying about television.
The next big event was the Jaarbeurs (Annual Fair) in Utrecht, central in The Netherlands, from March 15 to 25, 1938, and the first activity of the now available caravan nr.2. In two different buildings Philips set up the small studio and a viewing room with four TV sets. With a lot of crowd management groups of 1oo persons were allowed to watch the show for 10 minutes, two times two hours a day. Thousands of people watched TV for the first time in their life, and Philips created a lot of publicity with the event. |
|
After initial demonstrations in the Netherlands and Belgium, the two caravans started touring through Europe, mainly visiting the capitals of the European countries that didn't have their own TV development. These were often seen as astonishing breakthroughs, attracting large crows and much publicity. For example in Romania demonstrations were given to King Carol II and his family, where the arrival of the King was broadcast live. In September 1938, when in Serbia, the first caravan was quickly withdrawn to Eindhoven due to the München and Sudeten crisis, Hitler occupying Czechoslovakia. The second caravan, then in Scandinavia, stayed until November in Sweden, but then probably also returned. All four vans went into storage at the Eindhoven Strijp complex, until re-activated towards the summer of 1939. The first returned to Zagreb in Croatia, while the second caravan went to visit the Polish capital Warschaw. Why then and there is unclear, because the political pressure throughout Europe was visible to everyone. When the 2nd World War broke out in September 1st, 1939, both demo caravans were stuck in Eastern Europe. The first one could be repatriated by sea from Croatia, but the one in Poland had to be abandoned due to the fierce fighting in and around the Polish capital, the Philips crew was barely able to escape alive and return to Eindhoven. The vans were undoubtedly destroyed in the fierce Luftwaffe bombing of Warschaw. The two remaining vans were again parked on the Eindhoven Strijp complex and were subsequently destroyed in the December 6, 1942 RAF "Operation Oyster" bombing raids on the Philips factories.
|
|
Philips UK Televisions Tel6 and Tel61, 1937-1938
This set, which in an overview of the RadiOlympia sets was called Tel6, was a rear projection receiver in a large cabinet, also containing a Philips 750A-model full band radio receiver chassis, bringing the total valves to 29. A few interesting features were:
- It seems the set introduced some new valves designed specifically for the TV function, like the TSP4 RF/IF pentode and GT4H gas-filled triode. Others were the British equivalents of the European Philips valves: 2D4A=AB1, PenA4=AL3 or very similar (TH4A=ACH1). Interestingly, in Radiomuseum.org no other sets using the TSP4 and GT4H are known, only the contemporary Baird T5 used roughly the same TSP4-2DA4 IF video line up.
- Video and sound only had the first RF amplifier in common, followed by separate down-converters and IF chains. IF frequencies were very low; 11,1MHz video and 7,6MHz sound.
- After AM sound detection the audio signal was connected to the record player input of the radio which thus provided the audio output amplifier.
- Both the frame and line time base generators used gassed filled GT4H triodes in the oscillators
- The high voltage generator only used two high voltage rectifiers in a voltage doubling set-up, and not yet the fly-back concept with efficiency diodes that was only introduced towards the end of the forties. The high voltage was simply derived from the AC power supply using a high ratio transformer, yielding around 12kV. This was then rectified and doubled using the two diodes. A very dangerous construction, sometimes referred to as the "widow maker", because the voltage would not collapse when loaded like in the flyback circuit.
- The projection picture tube was a 4" (11,4cm) high intensity MS11/1, the output of which was projected via a 45degree mirror onto the back of a glass sandwich 20x16" (50x40cm) projection screen. Because there was not yet corrective optics between the picture tube and the display screen, the front of the tube was concave (bent inwards) in order to provide an undistorted picture.
Given the exclusive use of Mullard valves, in combination with the UK being the only television market at the time, is it highly likely that the set was developed by the Mullard Labs, the UK subsidiary and local brand name of Philips. Clearly with support from the NatLab Research, but almost certainly not built in Eindhoven. The receiver concept was reported in the February 1937 Philips Technical Review by C. Richards (almost certainly from Mullard Lab in Mitcham), while the rear projection concept of the set was published by M. Wolf from the NatLab in the Philips Technical Review of August 1937.
The set initially received a lot of positive attention and reviews, especially for the bright and large screen. (The next largest screens shown during the 1937 RadiOlympia were 13,5x10,75" (35x27cm) by GEC and Baird, so with more than twice smaller display area). Despite the fact that the set was removed from the show after only three days, a number of sets seems to have been sold, produced and delivered to customers. Unfortunately most of these had to be re-called due to field failures, with Philips even offering to reimburse the cost. The reason for all of this was the extremely short life time of the MS 11/1 projection tube. This was partly due to the high currents and voltages at which it was operating, and partly due to its sensitivity to breakdown. As soon as something would be wrong in the frame of line deflection drivers the result would be a horizontal or vertical line that would burn into the picture tube phosphors and destroy the tube. |
Having learned from this, during the 1938 RadiOlympia show Philips presented an improved set, the Tel61. Essentially it was the same platform but with three gas filled triodes as electronic relays that switched off the deflection and anode voltages to the picture tube in case of problems. The radio had been upgraded to the 753A. Another improvement was that the IF moved up to 13,2MHz for video and 9,7MHz for sound, values that would remain so for the next decade.
One last interesting element is that the Tel6 or 61 chassis also turned up in France, where it received a local cabinet update. Only a single very bad picture exists, from the book "La Télévision pratique" (H. Denis, 1938), where it says large screen Philips receiver. The width of the sets equals the Tel61, but the single-know operation and the lack of the radio dial ressembles the Tel6. To be further investigated!
One last interesting element is that the Tel6 or 61 chassis also turned up in France, where it received a local cabinet update. Only a single very bad picture exists, from the book "La Télévision pratique" (H. Denis, 1938), where it says large screen Philips receiver. The width of the sets equals the Tel61, but the single-know operation and the lack of the radio dial ressembles the Tel6. To be further investigated!
Three pictures of the 1937 and 1938 RadiOlympia Philips UK television sets. On the left the 1937 model Tel6, showing the large 20x16" (50x40cm) screen. Centre and right the 1938 Tel61 model, slightly more compact with a 18x14,5" (45x39cm) screen. Note that the picture screen dimension where 5:4 for the 405 line standard, only later they switched to 4:3. Furthermore, the Tel61 cabinet on the right clearly has a smaller width than the Tel6 on the left. [Images from review articles Television and Short Wave World Magazine October 1937 and September 1938, via TheValvePage.com, centre image from Daily Herald]
Philips 2400, the direct view production set, 1939
In 1938 ir. P.R. Dijksterhuis, the head of the Apparaten Lab, where radio and television product development was done, warned the Philips management that in his view the television activities where too low level and unstructured, and would not lead to a strong Philips position in this domain. He proposed that the majority of the NatLab research activities should be devoted to television, including a strong focus on radio valves optimized for the application. The first was blocked by Holst, but it was agreed that the NatLab would step up the television activities in order to build a strong patent position, and valve activities were also increased.
For 1939 Philips finally had bigger plans, with the Apparaten (set manufacturing) organization stepping in to make the move to a first generation real production sets. The set up consequently saw a number of major changes against the Research-developed Tel6 and Tel61:
|
|
In this context it is interesting to spend some attention to the EE50 development, which has been described in detail on Ronald Dekker's site, but deserves a summary here. The EE50 was the first major development of a new, smaller and cheaper radio valve construction, which was triggered by the introduction in 1934 of the RCA Acorn or Loktal tubes. Developments in the NatLab Research group of Johan Jonkers and the Radiobuizen division were slow, and the first prototype was only presented in September 1938. In the light of the earlier mentioned discussions on the importance and priority of television developments within Philips, it is remarkable that the first valves in the new 50-series were targeting television applications, and that first public advertisements were already three months later.
|
One of the very first public advertisements of the new EE50 glass-base secondary emission valve. This is from a special issue on TV valves in the French journal "Haut Parleur" from December 1938. All other valves are from the classical Miniwatt 4600 series, and identical to those used in the 1936 Philips/CFH Müller TV. Note that the MW22-1 magnetic deflection picture tube is also mentioned, although the picture shows an electrostatic CRT. [Retronik.fr]
|
The first was as mentioned the EE50, a secondary emission pentode developed in the group of Jonkers. This concept gave the valve an exceptionally high transconductance of 14mA/V, almost 3 times that of an ordinary contemporary pentode, thus substantially reducing the number of stages required for RF and IF amplification. However, the compromise for the high gain was higher noise, and in parallel the more standard pentode EF50 was developed with a transconductance of 6mA/V but better noise. This was the famous tube that was used in the 45MHz TV RF/IF strip of Pye in their 12C 1939 television, and then quickly copied and used by Watson-Watt and his team that were developing the military Chain Home early warning radar system. The EF50 thus became "the valve than won the war". Still, the technology of these new valves was fragile, and both the EE50 and EF50 went through a number of optimization cycles. First they had thick straight pins, which changed to thinner hooked pins to reduce cracks. But also these were not reliable and finally changed to straight thin pins. Also the top grid connection was eliminated and moved to a standard pin. Especially the EF50 was very much driven by the requirements of Pye, and included the adoption of the famous red metal shield over the glass housing.
The technology behind the 2400 family has been mysterious for a long while. In an author-less article "compiled by C. Heller" in the Philips Technical Review of December 1939 the latest picture tube receiver was described, but without mentioning a single valve type. A circuit diagram of the 2407 is known, again without the mentioning of valve names. I've thought initially that the similarity with the Tel61 should have been high, but it has now become obvious, based on the detailed description of the Italian 2400/23 version, that the 2400 was an entirely redesigned chassis with a clear focus on low cost and good manufacturability. It is likely the platform was designed in the Eindhoven-Strijp Apparatenlab, although involvement of the Mullard lab is also quite logical. The fact that the Italian version was coded 2400/23, i.e. the basic platform name 2400 with the suffix 23 referring to Italy, is a strong indication in this direction.
Compared to the Tel61, the EE50 amplifier allowed to reduce the number of IF amplifier valves from five to two! The IF signal was so strong that after peak detection it could even be connected directly to the picture tube cathode, without the need for the usual video output power pentode. The detectors, three of them, also used the new miniature all-glass EA50 diode. The other remarkable valve is the EC50, a Helium-filled thyratron valve specifically designed for saw tooth oscillators. Most other valves, except those for power functions, were regular Miniwatt E-series valves used in high volume in radios. Only in retrospect it can be said that this low valve count was a major achievement: it would take 15 years before Philips produced another TV with 17 valves or less (the 17TD120 in 1954 with 16 valves, but also the first solid state diodes)! The chassis was constructed in two parts, one for the deflection and high voltage generation and one for the small signal RF-IF-AF chains. The cabinets were typical for the time, and needed be sufficiently big to reflect the high price. As said earlier, the table top model 2405, intentionally or not, had a high resemblance with the mandatory German Einheitsfernsehemfänger design. |
The 2400 family was first shown in public during the August 1939 London RadiOlympia show, where they received good reviews. Production was ready to ramp when on September 1st war broke out. Germany invaded Poland, followed by Britain and France declaring war on Germany. The BBC immediately stopped all experimental television broadcasting and as a consequence all production plans in the UK and France were put on hold by Philips. Only in Italy activities continued, see pictures. In 1939 on Rome Monte Mario hill a transmitter station was built mainly based on Philips components, which probably did some experimental transmissions through 1940. But the war effectively put a stop on most TV developments in Europe, although the Axis powers Germany and Italy continued a modest roll-out of their 441-line system at least symbolically, with ironically the Eiffel tower transmitter in Paris being the most visible activity.
|
It also meant the premature end of the Philips 2400 TV platform, which at least in terms of valve count and robustness looked so promising. It also effectively ended the life of the EE50 tetrode in consumer applications, beyond 1939 there is only the Italian Magnadyne TM20 TV that is known to have used these valves. Its sister valve EF50, in contrast, became the standard RF/IF amplifier tube for all UK radio and radar sets. In the days following the German invasion of Holland in May 1940 Philips brought a few truck loads of EF50s and its manufacturing equipment to the UK, where Mullard took up volume production.
The outbreak of war and the subsequent occupation of the Netherlands put an official stop to Dutch and Philips television developments. During the war all product development and system experiments on television were stopped, but theoretical work continued, albeit on a lower level. One of the topics was theoretical analysis of beam deflection in display tubes, an investment that would pay off in the following years. The single publications on TV-related developments was on a new transmitter implementation. The transmitter power was increased from the roughly 500W of the 1937 system to 9kW using new water-cooled PAW12/15 transmit pentodes. Initially (1942) this transmitter was still using full dual side bands (2x2,5MHz) of the signal, only later vestigial side band modulation would be introduced.
The outbreak of war and the subsequent occupation of the Netherlands put an official stop to Dutch and Philips television developments. During the war all product development and system experiments on television were stopped, but theoretical work continued, albeit on a lower level. One of the topics was theoretical analysis of beam deflection in display tubes, an investment that would pay off in the following years. The single publications on TV-related developments was on a new transmitter implementation. The transmitter power was increased from the roughly 500W of the 1937 system to 9kW using new water-cooled PAW12/15 transmit pentodes. Initially (1942) this transmitter was still using full dual side bands (2x2,5MHz) of the signal, only later vestigial side band modulation would be introduced.
Television Standards 1946-1948
During the first years after the war, 1945-1946, there were - in Western Europe - essentially only two countries with regular television transmission: Britain and France. In the background there was of course the US, where television transmission had started during the second half of the war years. It won't be a surprise that all three countries used different standards, summarized below:
The British 405 line standard and the French 441 line standard were both based on pre-war systems, from a time when achieving bandwidth was still a challenge. But by 1946 especially the 405 line system was considered as too low in resolution, and on larger screens the lines became visible. "Spot Wobble" was used as one option to smear out the lines, of course at the expense of vertical resolution. Although the French were transmitting the 441-line signals from the Eiffel Tower in Paris, it was clear that it would not be the targeted system for France. Based on this situation as a starting point, there were two more or less parallel development tracks in Europe.
The first was a British-French alignment. On the one hand the British were leading in Europe, with actual television transmissions starting in 1946 from the Alexandra Palace transmitter in London, and more transmitters being installed throughout the country in the years after. Britain openly had the intention to spread its standard towards the continent, to facilitate exchange of programs and to support British industry. However, in France the trend was clearly to higher resolution standards, initially a 1020 lines system was proposed, but by November 1948 French authorities decided for the competing 819 lines system. Compared to all other standards of that time this could be considered as high definition television, which was seen as part of the policy to push French technology excellence, of course at the price of high channel bandwidth and thus fewer transmitters per band. (There was place for only two channels in VHF-I, and most were consequently in VHF-III). Intensive discussions took place between the French and British television authorities, converging on the following plan: the French were to adopt the British 405-line system for the 45-80MHz VHF-I band, thus replacing the Eiffel Tower 441 line transmissions. In return the UK would adopt the 819 lines HDTV system for transmission in the VHF-III (160-210MHz) band once it would move there. Jointly this would then be the proposal into the CCIR (Comité Consultatif International du Radio, headquartered in Genève, Switzerland) standardization committee of the ITU.
The first was a British-French alignment. On the one hand the British were leading in Europe, with actual television transmissions starting in 1946 from the Alexandra Palace transmitter in London, and more transmitters being installed throughout the country in the years after. Britain openly had the intention to spread its standard towards the continent, to facilitate exchange of programs and to support British industry. However, in France the trend was clearly to higher resolution standards, initially a 1020 lines system was proposed, but by November 1948 French authorities decided for the competing 819 lines system. Compared to all other standards of that time this could be considered as high definition television, which was seen as part of the policy to push French technology excellence, of course at the price of high channel bandwidth and thus fewer transmitters per band. (There was place for only two channels in VHF-I, and most were consequently in VHF-III). Intensive discussions took place between the French and British television authorities, converging on the following plan: the French were to adopt the British 405-line system for the 45-80MHz VHF-I band, thus replacing the Eiffel Tower 441 line transmissions. In return the UK would adopt the 819 lines HDTV system for transmission in the VHF-III (160-210MHz) band once it would move there. Jointly this would then be the proposal into the CCIR (Comité Consultatif International du Radio, headquartered in Genève, Switzerland) standardization committee of the ITU.
The other track was building on the US NTSC system, in practice the best system then operating. Especially RCA was promoting the re-use of it standard in Europe, adapted from the 60 to 50Hz power supply frequency. And this is where Philips comes in! Although it is not possible to re-trace the history in all details yet, it is likely that Philips decided to build upon the US system due to its own presence in the US, potentially benefiting from a technical synergy between the two systems. As a consequence Philips developed a 567-line 50Hz (25 frames) standard, giving a line frequency of 567*25= 14.174Hz, close to the 15.750Hz of NTSC. At the same time I recently discovered that Philips already had worked on 567-line systems as early as 1937, see above. At that time 525-line NTSC had not been developed yet, which makes that link less plausible. In theory 567 lines in combination with 4:3 screen size would require a video bandwidth of 5,5MHz and a channel width of 7MHz. However, for maximum compatibility with NTSC a lot of that standards parameters were (later) taken over: 6MHz channel, 4,2MHz video bandwidth, negative modulation and an FM sound carrier 4,5MHz above the picture carrier. The lower video bandwidth resulted in a lower horizontal resolution, but delivered a very economical system and high synergy with the US system.
The 567-line standard was defined by a group of people in the research groups of van der Pol and Haantjes. On December 7, 1945 an internal NatLab report was written by J. van der Mark explaining the choices for the bandwidth and line rate. Philips was quite bullish about its standard, and seriously tried to promote it as the European standard to the surrounding countries. Johan Haantjes was the main promoter of television broadcast within Philips, and also the primary external contact to Dutch authorities, the PTT and potential broadcast corporations in Hilversum. He was likely also the representative proposing and promoting the Philips standard in the CCIR.
The only actual 567-line promotion material found is a Philips Report entitled "Quelques données sur le système de télévision à 567 lignes et sur le récepteur à projection" (Some information on the 567-line television system and the projection receiver). It is not numbered and not authored, which suggests it was intended for external use, in this case France and Belgium. The report discussed the main system choices, where it is interesting to see that it gives many arguments against the positive modulation and AM sound used in the proposed French standards. It also shows the SG860 receiver which will be discussed further down. A last interesting observation is that Philips apparently had devised a logo for its 567-line TV standard, as shown on the cover. |
Philips rear projection TV, 1947
After the war, work on television was taken to a higher level again at the Natuurkundig Laboratorium. In 1946 its founder Holst retired, and was replaced by three directors each covering a fundamental group of activities: Hendrik Casimir for physics/devices, Evert Verwey for chemistry/materials and Herre Rinia for systems/electronics. This NatLab structure would exist for fifty years till well into the 1990s! One of the group leaders was Prof.Dr.Ir. Johan Jonker (1901-1963), who between 1931 and 1936 had created the Radiobuizen Lab, which will be discussed later. After his return to the NatLab his group continued work on advanced valves, such as high frequency and high power transmission tubes including magnetrons, klystrons and travelling wave tubes, cathode ray tubes and camera tubes. His team was also responsible for the invention of the EQ40 enneode phi-detector as well as the E1T counting valve. In the sector of Rinia Haantjes took over the receiver group, while van der Pol continued to lead the transmitter activities until his retirement in 1949. That group was then taken over by van der Mark. Some time later all television research activities would be integrated under Haantjes, who led them till he became vice president in 1956.
As said earlier, the Philips television strategy was primarily built around projection TV. This was the concept that had been used for the 1937-39 demonstrations, and on which the research activities had been continued during the war years. When television started to gain momentum again after the war, Philips development activities continued based on this concept. After the definition of the 567-line standard, the next step was to build a prototype system around it. Many details of this prototype system are known through a number of publications in the research Philips Technical Review journal, with articles written by some of the key players introduced earlier:
[*] The product code for picture tubes was: 1st letter: D = Electrostatic deflection, M = Magnetic Deflection; 2nd letter B= Blue, S = Green, W = White medium persistence fluorescence; 6, 22, 31 = screen diagonal dimension in cm; -1 suffix is generational indicator.
As said earlier, the Philips television strategy was primarily built around projection TV. This was the concept that had been used for the 1937-39 demonstrations, and on which the research activities had been continued during the war years. When television started to gain momentum again after the war, Philips development activities continued based on this concept. After the definition of the 567-line standard, the next step was to build a prototype system around it. Many details of this prototype system are known through a number of publications in the research Philips Technical Review journal, with articles written by some of the key players introduced earlier:
- PTR Vol7 1942, No5, pp.129-137, A nine kilowatt experimental television transmitter, M. van de Beek
- PTR Vol10 1948, No3, pp.69-78, Projection Television Receiver I. The optical system for the projection, P.M. van Alphen and H. Rinia
- PTR Vol10 1948, No4, pp.97-104, Projection Television Receiver II. The Cathode-Ray Tube, J. de Gier
- PTR Vol10 1948, No5, pp.125-134, Projection Television Receiver III. The 25kV Anode Voltage Supply, G.J. Siezen and F. Kerkhof
- PTR Vol10 1949, No10, pp.307-317, Projection Television Receiver IV. The circuits for deflecting the electron beam, J. Haantjes and F. Kerkhof
- PTR Vol10 1949, No.12, pp.364-370, Projection Television Receiver V. The synchronization, J. Haantjes and F. Kerkhof.
[*] The product code for picture tubes was: 1st letter: D = Electrostatic deflection, M = Magnetic Deflection; 2nd letter B= Blue, S = Green, W = White medium persistence fluorescence; 6, 22, 31 = screen diagonal dimension in cm; -1 suffix is generational indicator.
The optical unit was clearly the most complex of the television receiver. The purpose was to project the image of the MW6-2 picture tube on much larger display screen with as little deformation and loss of light intensity as possible. For this a Schmidt optical system had been selected, the same as used in most astronomy telescopes. [In this context it is interesting to know that Philips also internally produced the 30cm telescope for the Philips Astronomical Observatory in Eindhoven (today the Dr A.F. Philips Sterrenwacht). This telescope was designed by Herre Rinia, who was also amateur astronomer!]. The picture was magnified roughly 6 times and rear-projected on a 32x40cm frosted glass projection screen. This was considered large enough to have multiple people in the same room watch the television program. The optical module was fairly compact in a roughly 30x30x30cm enclosed box, with only the MW6 foot sticking out for electrical connections. The light exited the box almost vertically through a glass plate window, which made cleaning easy and kept the optics dust-free. However, despite the high-intensity image output of the MW6 screen, the multi-element complex optical path (spherical mirror M1, plane mirror M2, corrective lens C, window D, followed by the 45degres mirror in the cover and finally the half-transparent projection screen) introduced quite some light losses, and although the picture had good resolution and - for the time - a large size, it was not very bright. (I've witnessed this on Jac Janssen's working SX861A!)
The electronics of the first TV set were very basic, and clearly based on the system designed during the previous years. It was thus almost entirely based on the E20/30 Miniwatt series, with valves such as the EBC33, ECH21, ECL21, EL34 and EL38. Only a few modern valves that had just been released like the EA40 efficiency diode and EY51 high voltage rectifier were used. Special attention was required for the 25kV high voltage supply for the MW6-1 and -2 anode, which was at the time a very high voltage for a consumer device. The third paper in the PTR series describes the blocking oscillator concept, followed by a cascaded rectifier stack.
|
As said, the NatLab had the lead in developing a prototype system, based on the new optical system and the MW6-1. It used a cabinet of roughly the same "narrow" shape as the pre-war Tel61, and can be seen in the above picture with Frits Philips. The same set appears in the French report promoting the 567-line standard, see below pictures. These show that, despite the title of the chapter claiming this is a "SG860A for 567 lines", we see a low line count receiver, with lower right the six EF50 TRF receiver identical to the one used in the SG860A. The deflection unit lower left contains the additional transformer and EY1 for the 300V Vg2 of the MW6-1. Interestingly, the deflection unit also contained two selenium rectifier diodes, the first known use of a semi-conductor in a Philips TV set! Also, the SG860A introduced the EA40 efficiency diode in the line deflection circuit, a major efficiency improvement. On the top level we see the BX660 three-band radio left and the power supply chassis right. The set worked on classical parallel connected 6,3V heaters, and the power supply thus contained an enormous and heavy supply transformer. Although there are some as yet unconfirmed rumours about a French SF651A version, and descriptions are missing or confusing, it is most likely we are looking at the SG860A 405-line prototype.
Three beautiful pictures of the NatLab SG860A 405-line prototype system, as shown in the report "Quelques données sur le système de télévision à 567 lignes et sur le récepteur à projection" (Some information on the 567-line television system and the projection receiver). Left the front view, still without tuning dial. Note the lower width of the cabinet compared with the later "real" SG860A. Centre the interior view showing clock-wise from top left around the central optical display assembly: the three-band radio, 4-band switch, power supply, TRF radio, 25kV high-voltage supply with the can containing three EY51's, and finally the deflection unit. The right picture shows the set with extended chassis racks for servicing. [Edvard Paling collection]
Block diagram of the Philips SG860 405-line prototype rear projection TV. Note the non-heterodyne TRF receivers for video and sound, the first generation MW6-1 display tube and the separate 25kV supply module. The MW6-1 gate2, which required a voltage 150V above the cathode potential of 250V, used a dedicated EY1 power supply rectifier and HV transformer.
The SG860A was in the course of 1946 transferred from the NatLab to the Apparatenfabriek, where a small series was produced. The official documentation of the SG860, testifying the official adoption by set development, has July 1946 as the first release date for the radio module, October 1946 for most of the circuit diagrams, and July 1947 for the parts lists, with further small updates throughout 1947. So it is fair to assume that this period from mid 1946 till mid 1947 was the time that the SG860 got "productized". The main change in the "product" SG860A was the wider cabinet, with the addition of three decorative protection bars across the speaker cover. The set also received its dedicated radio dial. Internally it was identical to the narrow cabinet NatLab set, apart from the wider space. It is doubtful if many (or any) of these sets was actually sold in the UK, since there are no commercial traces. It seems the set was not shown during the 1947 RadiOlympia show in London, where the focus was on the first really commercial TV sets 463A and 563A, based on the direct view picture tube.
Philips SX861A, the first 567-line television, 1947
Immediately following the 405-line SG860A, developments were started of a 567-line version, which would become the SX861A. Conceptually it copied the SG860A, and many modules were component by component identical, although the receiver required adaptation to the new 567-line standard. It also introduced a number of new functional concepts:
- The RF input became a classical heterodyne (pre-amplifier and mixer-oscillator) and was now common for video and sound, and only after the 2nd IF amplifier the sound IF was split off into its separate chain. To accommodate the 6MHz channel bandwidth for 567 lines the video IF was chosen at 19MHz, with the sound IF 4,5MHz lower at 14,5MHz;
- The SX861A introduced FM sound demodulation, linked to the 567-line standard, and using a dual diode EB4 Foster-Seeley type FM demodulator;
- The set copied the line fly-back concept with an EA40 efficiency diode, introduced with the SG860A. A second diode, an EA50, was added and limited the line deflection voltage;
- The SX861A used the newer MW6-2 picture tube, replacing the MW6-1 of the SG860A. Therefore the EY1 for the g2 450V voltage was no longer required since g2 was now connected to 300V;
- Like the SG860A it used the 25kV CRT supply module as developed for the Research prototype. A single EBC3 was used as protection circuit, switching off the MW6-2 electron gun in case of any malfunction in the deflection circuits. As mentioned this circuit also contained the two Selenium rectifiers. Because the 567 line output required higher voltages and more power than the SG860A 405 lines, an AZ41 power supply rectifier was added.
Despite the official focus on the rear projection concept, apparently direct view television was not totally neglected. It seems that, probably also for the experimental transmissions that were planned to start soon, a prototype series of direct view sets was built too. In the only known official documentation, an undated component list, it is called "direct-zicht console" (direct view console). Jac Janssen possesses such a unique set which we'll call the "TX660A", with the T referring to direct view sets and the 6 to indicate a more modest feature level (console but smaller cabinet, no radio) compared to the SG/SX860. The TX660A essentially was a modified SX861, with a few differences:
|
First commercial TV sets, 1947-48
By this time, we speak 1946, the UK was the only serious television country in Europe. During the war years most companies in the UK, including Philips/Mullard, switched to military applications and had no resources to work on consumer applications. When the BBC resumed television broadcasting in July 1946, most manufacturers - with the exception of Pye, which had secretly developed a new platform during the war - had to start where they had stopped developments in 1939. The same was true for Philips, and the first family that was developed was thus heavily based on the 1939 Tel61 platform, the last one that had made it to production. In 1947 two models were launched, the 463A and 563A, the next year the 663A and 383A. Where it seems the 383A re-used the 2405 cabinet from 1939, the while the 663A looked very much like the Tel61, albeit without the projection screen. This family of TVs was based on the SX861A/TX660A chassis from Eindhoven. The intention of the Apparaten Lab was undoubtedly to have the design done in Eindhoven, and then transferred to Mitcham for local industrialization. However, the transfer from Eindhoven to Mitcham seems to have been problematic, Mitcham claiming that it was not good enough and requiring modifications. Looking at the final solution there area number of differences that often reflect the Mullard involvement:
- this was the first post-war chassis not based on rear projection, but using direct view MW22 picture tubes. The 463, 563 and 383 used the new Philips MW22-7 9" picture tube, while the 663A was the first TV with the new 13" MW31-7 tube;
- all new 20-series valves (ECH21, EBL21) were replaced by the older local favourites ECH35, EBL33 and EL33. It also introduced the first miniature Ex90 valve as video detector and interference suppressor in the sync separator, the EB91. (The EB91 in this platform is a bit of an enigma. According most official documentation this valve was launched in 1949 as part of the miniature Noval series. Since the four sets were shown at the RadiOlympia 1947 AND the official service documentation clearly lists this valve, something doesn't fit. As we will see further down it happened regularly that valves were used in internal development and reference designs well before public launch. I therefore tend towards the scenario that the EB91 was available in 1946-47 for internal set development and that there is no conflict in timing);
- the sound IF was clearly a local Mullard Labs pre-occupation, where they consistently deviated from the concepts developed in Eindhoven. So where the SX8161/TX660A already used a common RF-to-IF down-conversion for video and sound, the 383A chassis used separate mixer-oscillators for the video and sound paths. This is an architecture not seen in any other Philips set. Although the number of valves was identical for the RF-IF chain, the 383A solution (6x EF50, 2x ECH35) was more expensive than in the TX660A (7x EF50, 1x ECH21);
- in the 563A and 663A, the models with a radio option, the radio bands re-used the TV chain while adding an EF39 pre-amp and EM34 magic eye tuning indicator. Note that, in contrast to most other TV sets with radio, the latter function was not a complete radio chassis added to the TV cabinet, but that here the TV and radio RF/IF/AF functions were really integrated;
- the EA40 efficiency diode in the line output driver was not yet introduced, while the picture tube anode voltage generation required two HVR2 rectifiers, instead of the single EY51 in the SX861A.
The main argument in the complaints of the Mitcham Mullard Lab was that the Eindhoven designed prototypes were not properly measured for the 405-line transmissions, due to a lack of test signals. Which seems a bit strange, given that Eindhoven had built 405-line transmitters as early as 1937. It is hard to imagine they didn't have some sort of test signal generators in the Apparaten Lab. Nevertheless the argument gained momentum, and after the frictional development of the 463-563-383-663 chassis the centre of gravity of product design for UK sets moved to Mitcham. My guess is that they had already started the development of a local chassis in Mitcham, because in the same year the 520A or Mullard MTS521 appeared. It seems that the objective was to design a TV as cheap as possible, which effectively meant with the lowest number of preferably simple valves. It deviated quite a bit from the 463-chassis:
|
The set was split into two chassis; one for the sound plus the video RF and IF, probably up to and including the EB41 video detector. This chassis was mounted upside down from the cabinet top, with special valve clips for the 30-series valves to prevent them from falling down. The bottom chassis contained all deflection and high voltage circuitry.
It seems that the 520A/MTS521 was a one-off exercise, developed separate from its 465-family contemporaries, nor re-used in any other Philips or Mullard TV set.
It seems that the 520A/MTS521 was a one-off exercise, developed separate from its 465-family contemporaries, nor re-used in any other Philips or Mullard TV set.
Philips Experimental Television (PET), 1948
In order to bring television promotion and publicity to the next level, Philips decided it was time to start actual broadcast transmissions of television programs. Because there was no organization able to organize and execute this, it ended up as a 100% Philips activity. To start a transmitter was installed on the roof of one of the tall buildings of the massive Strijp-S factory complex in Eindhoven. On the southernmost distribution centre building (the so-called "Veemgebouw") of the Apparaten factories a lattice tower was erected, on top of which two antennas were mounted, one for the picture transmitter and one for the sound transmitter. Note that at this time the video and audio baseband signals were not yet combined into one composite television signal, with the sound carrier at 4,5MHz as was done later. In that case the composite baseband signal is in one step modulated on the picture carrier, with a guaranteed frequency distance between picture and sound carrier. By the time of the experimental transmissions picture and sound were transmitted by two separate transmitters, that had to be precisely controlled in terms of frequency separation and power level. In most systems the sound transmission power was 4 times (6dB) lower than the picture carrier. The video transmitter was called PAB3, the sound transmitter PAG3 (my guess is the abbreviations stand for Philips Apparaten Beeld and Philips Apparaten Geluid). The video transmitter had an effective transmit power of 20kW, giving a normative reception range of 30-40km. The picture transmission frequency was 63,25MHz, sound was at 67,75MHz, as mentioned earlier both with vertical polarization.
Only the next requirement were programs to be broadcast. To this end a very small one room 5x11m studio was created on the ground floor of the NatLab, opposite the street of the transmitter building. The studio room was so small that apparently it had to be entered through the window, the door being blocked by all equipment. Especially the cameras were still massive. Programs were organized and filmed by Eric de Vries, who had already been involved with the television demonstrations before the war. A variety of programs was transmitted, often a mix of flower arranging, child care instruction, music, comedy and other forms of risk-free information and entertainment. Much later, in 1950, the first life soccer match registration of the local derby PSV-Eindhoven would be transmitted, which generated much more enthusiasm. It should be remembered that the television experiments were not just to test the electronics of the system, but also to explore what television could mean to the public, which programs could be relevant and what the viewing experience of the viewers was. After all it was an entirely new medium! Philips had requested a radio licence for television transmission from the Dutch PTT, which they received March 18, 1948. The same day the first experimental transmission was made of what was now called Philips Experimentele Televisie (Philips Experimental Television, PET). The first transmission was announced by Bep Schäfer, a Philips secretary, as "Goedenavond, dames en heren. Hier is Philips Experimentele Televisie met de eerste uitzending. Beeld en geluid over de zenders PAB3 en PAG3...". Regular transmissions started April 1st, 1948, three times a week for 2-3 hours.
|
|
Aerial picture of the southern part of the Eindhoven Strijp factory complex of Philips, looking north. The white encircled low-rise section in the foreground is the Natuurkundig Laboratorium (NatLab), with in one of the left-most buildings the PET studio. The long high-rise buildings running along the central axis of the complex belong to the Apparaten organization, and contain both the radio and television development as well as factories. On its western-most building indicated by the arrow the PET transmitters were located. [PTR Vol.13 1951]
The third element of the PET system were of course the receivers. To this end some tens of the SX861A rear projection and TX660A direct view experimental receivers were placed in the homes of mostly higher Philips management and local dignitaries. That both types of receivers were deployed is reported in an article in Radio Wereld on April 8, 1948, quoting:
"The receiver models shown consisted of two models (one for direct viewing on the front of a cathode ray tube, and one with projection) are no devices made in a laboratory, [but real production sets]." The actual number produced is not known exactly some sources saying 20, others 75. People with a receiver set were asked to fill in questionnaires about both the system, perceived performance as well as feedback on the programs. Next to the officially distributed Philips receivers quickly a serious number of radio amateurs started building experimental receivers, and the PET receptions were received up to 150km from Eindhoven. During a big electronics show in Groningen in November 1948 the PET transmissions were received too, a distance of 220km. Very quickly circuit diagrams and instructions for home-built receivers were published in e.g. the "Electron" publication of Veron, the Vereniging for Radio Amateurs in Nederland. |
Philips Protelgram, 1946-1949
But Philips didn't invest in all these developments just for fun or for the love of science; it wanted to do business. The first opportunity seemed to be the US. There television was booming since its introduction in 1943. Per month some 10.000 sets were produced, which were for a large part based on projection concepts similar to the one developed in the NatLab for the Philips 567-line system. But one of the main advantages of the 567-line standard was the synergy with the 525-line NTSC system, from which it was derived. The optical engine of the SG860A/SX861A receivers presented earlier could therefore be used with only minor adaptations in an NTSC television receiver. (The MW6-2 picture tube was registered in the US as 3NP4). Already in 1947 it was thus decided that the optical engine would be produced in the US under the name "Protelgram" and sold by the local Philips organization Norelco. To emphasize the importance of all this, two Philips board members, P. Dijksterhuis and P. van den Berg, were sent to the US to strenghten the US Philips television activities, and especially Protelgram. A facility at Dobbs Ferry (New York, since 1943 the Philips US headquarters)) took up production, and in 1948 Norelco started promoting its projection television module. Because at the time Philips didn't have its own television manufacturing organization in the US, only the optical engine plus its 25kV supply was sold in different versions as the Protelgram unit; Model 161A for 13x10"displays with rounded corners, Model 160A for 16x12" square displays, and Model 162A for movie-type projection on large screens. It needed be combined with a regular television chassis for signal reception and the deflection signal generation. The unit was used in amongst others the Scott 6T11A and Emerson television sets. From the Protelgram Service Manual as well as the 1948 Norelco advertisement it can be seen that the box is almost completely identical to the one presented in the Philips Technical Review in the same year. This means that the Research module was taken almost directly into production, which has proven over again to be a very risky approach, because the product had not been properly engineered. The same was true with the Protelgram module, and the production in Dobbs Ferry experienced many serious manufacturing issues, limiting the output of the fab to only 200 units per week. As a consequence customers massively cancelled orders, creating a serious business crisis.
|
The more fundamental killer of Protelgram, however, was not the complexity of the design, but the development of larger direct view picture tubes. Especially RCA, as the largest US TV player, invested in picture tubes with wider deflection angles. In 1946 it had introduced the 10BP4 10" round picture tube with a 50 degrees deflection angle. In 1948 the slightly larger 12" 12LP4 was introduced and in 1949 the 16" 16GP4. In 1946 most television models were still rear projection (with systems similar to the Philips Protelgram), in 1948 the mix rear projection-direct view was already 50:50, but by 1950 almost all RCA sets were based on the 16" direct view picture tubes.
This didn't go unnoticed to the Philips management. On March 5, 1948 ir. J.A.J. Bouman, head of the HIG Apparaten, sent the following alarming telegram from the US to his colleagues in Eindhoven: "Try to stop development work broadcast-receivers and concentrate all efforts on television stop Television is our biggest chance stop Protelgram is all-right but we have to work on follow up like hell! stop Write on all doors and walls and blackboards TELEVISION stop Make everyone television crazy stop We have enough people to do the job but most of them work on the wrong items stop There really is only one item: TELEVISION stop The only actual television front we have at the moment is right here in U.S.A. stop We are able to force it if we are ready to fight AND TO KEEP FIGHTING! stop Mobilise Eindhoven please stop No time to lose TELEVISION IS MARCHING ON HERE AND FROM HERE OVER THE WHOLE WORLD stop The only question is: WHO MARCHES ON WITH TELEVISION, PHILIPS OR THE OTHERS? stop THE OTHERS ARE ALREADY MARCHING! PHILIPS EINDHOVEN, TAKE THE LEAD ! fullstop'' |
For all clarity, in his telegram Bouman, when referring to "Television", meant direct viewing picture tube-based receiver sets. Although some people involved later disputed the decision was only due to Boumans' telegram, fact is that a rapid switch-over started to steer development activities toward direct view television. This is where the HIG Elektronenbuizen comes in, which fortunately had started work on picture tubes already.
The Protelgram situation didn't improve much, while the television-lobby also started to work against its concept. After 2,5MioHfl investments, a considerable sum at the time, the Philips Board took its losses and decided to stop Protelgram in September 1949. However, concepts can be persistent and we'll see rear projection television coming back later.
The Protelgram situation didn't improve much, while the television-lobby also started to work against its concept. After 2,5MioHfl investments, a considerable sum at the time, the Philips Board took its losses and decided to stop Protelgram in September 1949. However, concepts can be persistent and we'll see rear projection television coming back later.
The Radiobuizen-Lab
The development of television was tightly linked to the development of new valves. All post-war Radio Valve activities within Philips were concentrated in the HIG Elektronenbuizen (Division Electron Valves) initially led by Dr. Theodoor Tromp (1903-1984), until he became member of the management board of Philips. Also in the Philips Board remained the "patron" of the radio valve division. This included all manufacturing plants but also the valve development in Eindhoven. From 1946 onwards this was done in the Radiobuizen Lab, located on the 3rd floor of the "Witte Dame" (White Lady) building along the Emmalaan in Eindhoven. (The building still stands in almost perfect condition, although no longer owned by Philips. It now houses the Eindhoven City Library, the well-known Design Academy and apartments). Originally the activities had been split into two groups, the "Proefafdeling" (Sample Department) which was able to prototype all new valves, and the "Elektronisch Laboratorium" (Electrical Laboratory), responsible for specifying the valves, measuring them and making application reference designs. Since 1946, to improve the up till then notoriously bad co-operation, these two groups were combined into the single Radiobuizen-Lab organization under ir Gerrit Alma (1902-1997). Alma worked with Philips on the development of radio valves since 1929, and was one of the leading and most experienced managers in this domain. He seems to have been a very pleasant person, nice to work for, totally non-political and good for his departments. Under Alma were two dedicated labs: Radiobuizen Lab 1 with a focus on valve definition and their application, and Radiobuizen Lab 2 under ir. G. van Beusekom responsible for the valve design and engineering.
Under Alma the Radiobuizen-Lab continued to grow, hiring engineers that were to play leading roles in the coming developments and the further growth of the valves business. One of them was ir Klaas Rodenhuis, a young Delft graduate who joined Philips in 1941 and would later lead the Professional Valves section of the Radiobuizen-Lab 1, before moving to Hamburg in 1959 to become head of Philips-Valvo. A second was Dr Bert Dammers (1910-1968), who started at the NatLab Research in 1937, almost certainly working in the group of Jonkers. Around 1946 he was asked by Tromp to join the Radiobuizen-Lab 1 to lead the Consumer Valves section in Alma's organization. Dammers was to become the expert in valve-based application circuit design, and at the same time also the person defining combination valves, to optimize the application with the minimum number of valves. Between 1948 and the mid 1950's Dammers published large numbers of application notes, publications and book chapters related to valve applications, especially in the emerging television receiver domain. He also had very good relations with the valve engineering teams in the factories, as well as with the set development organizations of the HIG Apparaten in the many different countries where Philips was active. It was often Dammers who made the road trips to the different countries to explain the latest television valves and application trends to both the internal organization as well as set making customers of the valve sales organization, often talking to large audiences. [Most of the data on the Radiobuizen-Lab organization in above section is based on the research of my friend Ronald Dekker, also a valve aficionado and creator of the by now famous DOS4ever valve tester.] Dammers in turn hired young assistants for much of the practical work involved with valve and application measurements. And one of them was my father, Piet Hooijmans (1918-2006). While working in Amsterdam as telegraph operator for the Dutch PTT (Post, Telegraph, Telephone) on the long-distance connections, he had finished a professional training in electronics. Since Philips was expanding and could not find sufficient engineers locally in the province Noord-Brabant, there was quite some advertising, to which Piet reacted. He was invited to Eindhoven for interviews in February 1947, a very harsh winter and it took quite some effort and time to reach Eindhoven. But apparently the interview was successful, because on May 1st, 1947 he started in the Radiobuizen Lab 1, working for Mr Dammers. It looks that the Consumer Valves group worked essentially on three applications: radio receivers (mainly AM but with FM reception in development), amplifiers (for microphones, record players and later tape recorders) and television. From the available reports it seems that the application activities were exclusively using the E40 Rimlock series of valves up till end of 1948 or the beginning of 1949, at which moment a new series of Noval E80 and P80 valves was released. The Radiobuizen Lab application notes then also switch to the Noval series. Regularly articles were published in the Electronic Application Bulletin (EAB) of the HIG Elektronenbuizen, introducing new valves in combination with recommended circuit applications. The consumer group and its valves will play an important story in the coming story on the development of television. In parallel the professional group of Klaas Rodenhuis worked on such valves as thyratrons, X-ray, RF transmitters, gas filled switching valves etcetera. |
|
A few impressions of the Radiobuizen Lab in the Witte Dame on the Emmasingel in Eindhoven, probably from the early 1950's. Technicians wear a tie and white work jacket, bosses a suit and tie, which probably means that my father also walked around in such a white jacket. We see the engineers work on TV reference designs, which are built using folded metal frames with all large components (transformers, filters, all valves plus the picture tube) mounted on the top side, and all discrete components wired inside the frame. The same concept was used for the home-built TV's! [50 years Philips System Lab Eindhoven, 2002, via Oswald Moonen]
The "Witte Dame" (White Lady) building along the Emmasingel in Eindhoven, where the Radiobuizen Laboratory was housed on the 3rd floor. With the exception of the wall around the complex and the square brown building on the right picture, not much has changed on the look of the building, and today it is still as impressive as it was in the 1940's. [Ronald Dekker -DOS4Ever]
New Rimlock valves for television
Since 1946 the HIG Elektronenbuizen had been working hard on the roll-out of a new generation of radio valves: the Rimlock 40-series. Their main advantage was a much smaller size, pre-dominantly due to the new low-temperature all glass assembly process. Two major elements allowed this shrinking: 1. a method was found to have metal leads protrude through a glass footing without loss of vacuum inside the valve. This allowed for much smaller valve foot dimensions, which were standardized in the Rimlock base with eight pins equally spaced on a circle. 2. low temperature glass welding. This allowed the internal electron assembly to be mounted on the inner parts of the pins, where-after the glass encapsulation could be welded on the glass base plate at relatively low temperature without damaging the sensitive electron assembly. Philips used three standardized base dimensions: diameters of 22mm (Series A), 32mm (Series B) and 36mm (Series C). Only the 22mm Series A valves were formally called Rimlock. The first products brought to the market were the the Ux40 valves, using 0,1A heater current. These were pre-dominantly used in the modern small form factor radio sets that could be used in countries with 110V, 220V or even DC supply. The Rimlock series was announced in a Philips Technical Review article in October 1946, by Alma and Prakke. First products were released in 1947.
|
Where the 1946 PTR publication was a typical research story, focussing on the technical issues of the all-glass valve, the Rimlock series was introduced by the Radiobuizen organisation in publications of their Electronic Application Bulletin (EAB) in October 1946, followed by an updated family overview in December 1948 "Survey of the "MINIWATT" Rimlock E-valves". By this time the family had extended to some 14 E-valves (plus another 10 U-valves), which grouped in a number of application sub-families:
a) RF valves, mainly for radio
EAF41, ECH41 and EF41 b) other radio valves necessary to make a set EL41, a 9W 10mA/V power pentode AZ41 ( full wave rectifier, the only Rimlock valve with a directly heated cathode) It is expressly stated that these E-valves are equivalent to the already existing U-series equivalents. c) new valves ECH42 variable mu oscillator EAF42 very similar to the EAF41 but with g3 accessible with a separate pin EBC41 diode detector plus 70x triode amplifier EB41 for frequency discriminators EZ40 90mA full wave rectifier with high filament-cathode isolation d) new valves for amplifiers, television and measurement equipment ECC40 for push-pull amplifiers, 2,7mA/V, 30x amplification EF40 1,85mA/V LF amplifier with sharp cut-off EF42 high slope 9,5mA/V especially for television receivers e) battery supply power pentode EL42 6W pentode with only 200mW filament current |
All these valves (either as E- or U-valve) with the exception of the EL42 will appear in the television designs of the period. Two non-Rimlock valves that were used additionally were the ECH21 triode-heptode (which because of its 9 electrodes did not fit in the Rimlock series A base, and used the series B base) and the EY51 high voltage rectifier diode. The EY51 was used inside the high voltage supply for the picture tube anode and didn't have a classical base. At the bottom two wires (cathode and heater) and at the top one wire (the anode) protruded from the glass bulb, which could be soldered with very short contacts.
The MW22 picture tube
The last, but very important valve, was the picture tube. So although the official focus of Philips television developments was on rear projection using the MW6-2 high intensity projection tube, the Elektronenbuizen division had been working on a direct view larger picture tube. Surprisingly this development had started already well before the war! As it seems Mullard, the London-based UK subsidiary of Philips which was acquired in 1927, developed a first 9"/22cm picture tube as early as 1938. This tube, the MW22-1, was used in the 405-line UK television system, both the Philips models 2405/07/12 from 1939 as well as e.g. the Pye televisions models 815 and 838. Mullard was sailing a quite independent course from the Eindhoven headquarters, and in contrast to the formal doctrine on projection television believed much more in the direct view concept. This concept was industrialized by RCA together with the glass-making company Corning. They had invented the concept where a metal cone could be welded to the curved glass front section. This required two technology steps: glass moulding and the glass-metal connection. Mullard probably licensed the technology and bought the sub-components (the moulded glass front plate and the metal cone) for assembly in its own valve factory. However, the central forces were also strong, and Mullard would not have been allowed to work on these devices without central approval. And whatever the exact origin, the direct view picture tubes were immediately promoted by the Electronenbuizen sales organization.
The MW22-7 came available in 1947, and was for the coming 2 years the standard picture tube in all Philips direct view television development sets. In parallel it was of course sold in the UK under the Mullard brand and used in multiple television sets of Ferguson (model 841T), Bush (model T91) and Pye (B16T and D16T), mostly sets introduced in 1948-49. Where the MW22-7 had the parallel 6,3V heater supply of the Ex40 series, the MW22-14 introduced 0,3A serial heater supply equivalent to the Ux40 series.
In parallel to the MW22 series also the MW31 was developed, with a 64 degrees deflection angle and a screen width of 31cm (12"). The story on its development, sub versions and availability is almost identical. Because the 31cm tube was certainly more difficult to produce, its actual application lags the MW22 by roughly a year. Also the first versions of the MW31 were already available before the war, since the 1939 models 2409 and 2415 used this 12" picture tube. With this picture tube Philips now had all valves available to design direct view television receivers. |
TX380, television sets based on the new Rimlock valves, 1948
At this time, we write end of 1947 to early 1948, matters become more complex. Philips is rolling out its limited scale NatLab-based 567-line experimental system, Protelgram is being introduced in the US, the UK television roll-out is picking up speed and needs Philips solutions, and in France Philips also wants to have sets that can receive the Eiffel Tower 819-line transmissions. After the initial work by the NatLab research, the centre of gravity needs to move to the HIG's. Two organizations therefore scale up television set development:
- HIG Apparaten, which focuses on actual television receiver development. Central television development is in the Apparaten Lab (from here on AL, where "Apparaten" can best be translated by Devices) on the Strijp complex in Eindhoven, but in the big countries local development groups are active too. Especially in the UK, where the Philips subsidiary Mullard had a television development and production site in Mitcham. The official policy was that the platforms should come from Eindhoven, for local industrialization in the satellites. Not surprisingly the local "satellites" didn't like that concept.
- HIG Elektronenbuizen, which focuses on reference designs of the new valves that are being developed and released. These developments, both of the valves and the reference designs, take place in the Radiobuizen Laboratorium (RBL) on the Emmasingel in Eindhoven. This organisation didn't suffer from the multi-site structure of the HIG Apparaten, but in turn doesn't produce sets themselves, so always needs to "sell" their concepts to HIG Apparaten or third party customers. Or phrased more bluntly: the reference designs of the Radiobuizen Lab are not necessarily taken into production.
It must have been around 1947 that real television product development started in earnest. As we will see later, it is highly likely that the Radiobuizen Lab and the Apparaten Lab really combined all their knowledge to define a state-of-the-art television platform based as much as possible on the latest and most compact valves available. Here the first subtleties came in.
The HIG Apparaten logically wanted to have product platforms that could be used in as many countries as possible. This involved flexibility in not only the television standards, but also the power supply, which still varied across countries between 110 and 220V, 25 and 50Hz and AC or DC. To create this flexibility the use of power supply transformers was avoided whenever possible, which meant that the 6,3V heater supply for E-series valves was not available either. As a consequence all AL-designed sets used U-series valves for serial heater connection at 0,1A current. So the Apparaten Lab set itself to designing a TV platform based on the valves they were using already for radios: the UF42, UAF42, UB41, UL41, UCH42 and UY41. The only dedicated television valves were the ubiquitous EA40 efficiency diode, the UL44 line/frame time base output amplifier and the EY51 high voltage rectifier. The RBL in contrast focused on the application development, and although they made reference designs of complete sets they didn't focus on the power supply. In fact in the RBL they used standard power supply bench units supplying 250V and 6,3V, and the prototype units did not contain the power supply. See e.g. the reference design AM/FM receiver on the EQ40-page. As a consequence RBL reference designs always were based on E-series (6,3V) parallel heater supply valves. These designs were essentially the latest television design but with new valves inserted for performance optimization or valve count reduction. Examples are the EQ40, ECC40, EZ40 and EL43. It will be interesting to see which of the new valves of the RBL actually ended up in production televisions. |
The naming convention of Philips Television receivers 1945-1950
Starting from the second half of the 1940's the television receivers of Philips were coded as follows: TX123A/00 1st letter: always T for Televisie (Television) 2nd letter: country code of the production (!) facility
Not surprisingly the UK did not comply with the system since the letters TG were omitted (e.g. 383A being the first UK TV set). Secondary brands always used modified product codes: Mullard TV was MTSxxx with xxx the Philips code plus one; Radiola in France initially inverted the Philips number (TF651A became RA156A). |
Although started in 1947, the first television designs were ready in 1948, and thus the first generation televisions was coded as TX380 (with the 8 referring to product release in 1948). It is interesting to note that according to the product naming system the first digit 3 indicates it was positioned as a standard product, although given the price (85.000 old French Francs at the time) it could be considered a quite expensive product. All the more so because the product leaflet suggests the set also contained a full three-band radio receiver. The most logical explanation is that the screen size of 9" was already considered on the low side. For actual market introduction the most urgent version was for Great Britain (405-line system), the next France (still the 441-line system transmitting in Paris) and next the support of the fledgling Dutch (567-line system). The first market to introduce commercial TV sets for Philips was the UK, with the 465A and 565A launched in 1947, and their 1948 derivatives the 663A and 383A, as discussed in an earlier section. So next was a set for the French 41-line system.
The TF384A as it was called was the first to be based on the new Rimlock valves, with only the UCH21 and EY51 from another series. The design was based on the latest Philips valves and television reference design as used in the Radiobuizen Lab and Apparaten Lab, and it was apart from minor details identical to the RBL2 and the first TX594U designs. Because the latter two were designed for 567 lines instead of 441 lines, the TF384U could do with one IF amplifier less. And of course it didn't have an FM-based sound branch. Which brings us to the biggest oddity of this set: the sound concept. Here we have to realize that the TF384U was the last TV that was designed from the onset to deliver both television and multi-band radio reception. Using an existing radio chassis as e.g. in the UK sets was not possible due to the higher cost as well as the size constraints of the new table model cabinet. The unique solution was a sound branch integrated on the main chassis but electrically completely separate from the video branch. The receiver could be switched to radio or TV, where the TV sound IF was a unique low 1,5MHz. The video IF in contrast was the highest used to date in any Philips TV, 25,75MHz, which was almost certainly the same IF as used in the TX594U (27,5MHz) adapted downwards for the 441 lines. All in all this made the TF384A a unique set, as far as known this concept was not re-used in any other Philips TV.
The TF384A as it was called was the first to be based on the new Rimlock valves, with only the UCH21 and EY51 from another series. The design was based on the latest Philips valves and television reference design as used in the Radiobuizen Lab and Apparaten Lab, and it was apart from minor details identical to the RBL2 and the first TX594U designs. Because the latter two were designed for 567 lines instead of 441 lines, the TF384U could do with one IF amplifier less. And of course it didn't have an FM-based sound branch. Which brings us to the biggest oddity of this set: the sound concept. Here we have to realize that the TF384U was the last TV that was designed from the onset to deliver both television and multi-band radio reception. Using an existing radio chassis as e.g. in the UK sets was not possible due to the higher cost as well as the size constraints of the new table model cabinet. The unique solution was a sound branch integrated on the main chassis but electrically completely separate from the video branch. The receiver could be switched to radio or TV, where the TV sound IF was a unique low 1,5MHz. The video IF in contrast was the highest used to date in any Philips TV, 25,75MHz, which was almost certainly the same IF as used in the TX594U (27,5MHz) adapted downwards for the 441 lines. All in all this made the TF384A a unique set, as far as known this concept was not re-used in any other Philips TV.
TX390 upgraded platform, 1949
As described above, 1948 was the conversion year from the very first post-war chassis to the new Rimlock-valves state-of-the-art platform. The Mitcham 383A was still based on the old EF50 and E30 valves, while the TF384A indeed used the new valves but in combination with an immature sound chain. The 1949 TX390 chassis was the first entirely based on Rimlock valves, and the first to discard the concept of "TV is radio with pictures" and therefore the need to always have radio reception too. Furthermore, and strategically most important, the same basic platform was used for all three European TV segments: UK, France and the emerging proprietary 567-line Philips standard. A few of the main innovations of this new chassis were:
- The new sound chain architecture, that would remain the standard for the coming years, was introduced. Here the RF mixer-oscillator performs down-conversion of the entire TV channel, so picture and sound simultaneously, resulting in a combined picture-sound IF. These are then split into the video and sound IF chains for separate filtering, amplification and detection. Of course the UK and French sets used AM sound detection, the 567-line chassis FM sound detection.
- The last UCH21 was replaced by the UCH42 for frame and line time base oscillators.
- In general a very limited set of valves was used: UF42 RF/IF amplifiers, UAF sound IF amplifiers and detectors, UB41 video detector, UL41/44 power amplifiers for sound, video and both frame and line drivers, UCH42 as time base oscillators plus the by now standard EA40 efficiency diode and EY51 high-voltage rectifier. As we will see this was the result of the intense cooperation between the Apparaten and Radiobuizen Labs.
- The IF values were reduced back to what they had been before the TF384A: VIF/SIF of 13,0/9,0 (441 lines) or 13,4/9,9MHz (405 lines). The exception seems to have been the TX594U, which maintained the high 27,5/23MHz. Note that in both cases the LO frequency was below the RF, given that the transmitted sound carriers were also below the transmitted picture carriers. So for the French receivers of the 46MHz Paris Eiffel tower transmitter the LO was at 46-13=33MHz, for the UK Alexandra Palace 45MHz transmitter the LO was at 45-13,4=31,6MHz;
- The chassis now consistently introduced a noise suppression circuit between the video detector and synchronization splitter, allowing better reception in case of weak or disturbed signals. This concept was first implemented in the 383 in a more experimental way;
- With the serially fed heater supplies in the U-series valves there was no need for a supply transformer, and sets became fit for both AC and DC power supply, thus receiving the suffix U (for Universal supply).
The RF-IF line-up of the TX390, with B9 an UF42 pre-amplifier and B10 an UF42 self-oscillating mixer-oscillator. At the output of th mixer the sound-IF is immediately separated through S14-C69, thus reducing the bandwidth requirements for all following stages. This architecture would be the bases for the next two years.
Block diagram of the TF390 441-line set for France. Designed 1948, commercially launched 1949. First implementation of the new all-Rimlock architecture with the new standard sound IF chain. The TF402A, introduced one year later, was identical except for the new 31cm picture tube and two valve upgrades.
From this platform three first products were derived:
- The TX390 and TF390 for the French 441-line system, followed by the TF402U and 502U later;
- The 385A, 485U, 683U and 492U for the UK 405-line system;
- The TX594U for the proposed 567-line system.
TX594, the first 567-line set, 1948
The next challenge was to develop from the same chassis a Dutch (and of course potentially European) version for the 567-line standard, with its higher line rate, higher bandwidths and FM sound standard. The official documentation has a first release date 24-7-1948, so design must have started end of 1947 with the deflection and high-voltage design clearly based on the TX380 platform, but already implementing the sound chain improvements of the TX390. However, although we know there was a design in July 1948, we don't have the details on it (yet), only those of a much later 1949 modification that will be discussed further down. The block diagram can thus only be speculated, but would most probably look as follows:
Most remarkable is the fact that the FM sound detector does not yet use the EQ40, as recommended by the Radiobuizen Lab, but a classical Foster-Seeley detector based on a UB41 double diode. Because of the low detection gain this requires an additional UF42 sound amplifier before the power amplifier. Furthermore the TX594 seems to have introduced the much higher IF at double the value used so far: 27,5MHz VIF and 23,0MHz SIF. As already mentioned, the TF384A was the first to use these values in the first Philips commercial set for France. With three power rectifiers UY41 the total number of valves came to 23, the highest number of any direct view television set of the first generations. Around 150 pieces were built of the TX594U and distributed throughout Eindhoven, probably replacing most of the SX861A research sets that were called back. A number of sets might have gone to Denmark too, which was the only country opting for the 567-line standard. Philips supported local test transmissions in Denmark by supplying transmitter and receiver equipment. For reasons not entirely clear, the set, which was of the same design as the earlier TF384A, received the nickname "Hondje" (Doggie). Nevertheless, even despite the low volume, the TX594U will be in the annals of history as the first (almost) commercial television set in The Netherlands when it was launched end of 1948.
The last sets of the first generation, 1949
During 1948 and 1949 the TX390 platform was used as the basis for a number of last new products: the 385U for the British market, and the TF402 for the French market. They had 18 and 19 valves, respectively, and were based on the same platform architecture with only minor valve upgrades:
One of the landmarks of these sets was the introduction of a new 12"/31cm picture tube: the MW31-14 or -17, giving an almost twice larger image. As we've seen earlier at roughly the same time this picture tube was used in the 663A, an old platform chassis. These tubes had the same characteristics as their MW22 predecessors, and didn't require any electronics changes. The 485U and TX402A both used the 31cm tube, later followed by the 683U. In parallel the 22cm picture tubes migrated to the MW22-14 and later -17. And this in turn illustrates a next step in the growing maturity of the product: based on the same platform multiple models with different selling prices were introduced, especially in the British market where volumes were highest. In 1949 the 385U (mid end table top 9") and 683U (luxury console 9", also sold as the Mullard MTS684) were introduced, along with the 484U (mid end table top 12"). In 1950 the 492U followed (mid end table top 12"). In relation to the British market it should also be noted that in December 1949 the second transmitter station was activated at Sutton Coldfield near Birmingham, serving the Midlands. While Alexandra Palace in London was transmitting at 45MHz (picture, sound at 41,5MHz), the Birmingham transmissions were at 61,75/58,25MHz. Since the sets still did not contain a tuner, each television needed region-specific alignment of the RF-coils, and the set required modifying for receiving the other transmitter. Extensive change-over and alignment procedures are part of the Service Manuals. With these products the TX390 platform came to the end of its (design) life, and no further derivatives were developed. Started in 1947 it had served its purpose, releasing the first sets in 1948 and establishing Philips as an emerging television player in the UK (through its Mullard branch), France and even The Netherlands. All television receivers launched in 1948-50 were thus based on this platform. |
|
The last Philips TV model from the 1940 decade is at the same time a big question mark: the 799A. It was again a 12x16" (31x40cm) rear projection model, shown first at the 1949 RadiOlympia show, a large console also containing a full multi-band radio. Unfortunately no details are known so far, other than below pictures. The main question is which platform this chassis was based on: a late development of the SG860 original 405-line rear projection set from 1946/47, the TX390 direct view platform modified for rear projection, or a prototype of the Protelgram-based TX600 platform to appear in 1950. From the interior picture it looks like the high intensity display unit was not Protelgram, but without further documentation this is difficult to ascertain.
|
Activities at the Radiobuizen Lab, 1947-49
While their colleagues at the Apparaten Lab were busy rolling out the TX380 and TX390 platforms and their British and French derivatives, the Radiobuizen Lab worked on the application of new valves. For this they used the latest AL platform as the starting point, based on which they would then change specific circuit blocks using the new valve. As mentioned when introducing the RBL they used - at least initially - exclusively the 6,3V E-version of the Rimlock family.
The primary role of the consumer group (Dammers) in the RBL was to promote the application of the new Rimlock valves in consumer applications, which meant first and foremost radio, (record player) amplifiers and then the emerging television. As mentioned when introducing the Rimlock series the initial publication on the technical concept of the Rimlock all-glass base was in the research Philips Technical Review in 1946, but in the Electronic Application Bulletin (EAB) of 1949 the series was introduced on a practical application level. And since then there was a regular stream of specific valve introductions. The first one of these was on the EA40 efficiency diode for the line output amplifier and high voltage supply (EAB Vol.10 No.1 December 1948). The EA40 was in that sense successful, since used without exception in all first generation Philips television designs. The same was true for the EF42 and EY51, both designed specifically for television applications.
Normally it would be extremely difficult to trace back the activities of an organization like the RBL, but luckily I have three sets of schematics of television sets in the legacy of my father. These were the basis for the home-built televisions we will discuss in the next section. I have three of these schematics which I will call RBL1 to 3. They relate to the AL product designs as follows:
The primary role of the consumer group (Dammers) in the RBL was to promote the application of the new Rimlock valves in consumer applications, which meant first and foremost radio, (record player) amplifiers and then the emerging television. As mentioned when introducing the Rimlock series the initial publication on the technical concept of the Rimlock all-glass base was in the research Philips Technical Review in 1946, but in the Electronic Application Bulletin (EAB) of 1949 the series was introduced on a practical application level. And since then there was a regular stream of specific valve introductions. The first one of these was on the EA40 efficiency diode for the line output amplifier and high voltage supply (EAB Vol.10 No.1 December 1948). The EA40 was in that sense successful, since used without exception in all first generation Philips television designs. The same was true for the EF42 and EY51, both designed specifically for television applications.
Normally it would be extremely difficult to trace back the activities of an organization like the RBL, but luckily I have three sets of schematics of television sets in the legacy of my father. These were the basis for the home-built televisions we will discuss in the next section. I have three of these schematics which I will call RBL1 to 3. They relate to the AL product designs as follows:
- RBL1
This is a schematic dated 23-8-1948, signed by P. Huijser and titled "Schema van Televisie-ontvanger" (Schematic of television receiver). The concept is clearly based on the TX380, which was being developed at the same time.
Four different new valves were applied in this design:
- the EL43 power pentode, replacing the UL41. This valve never made it to volume production, and was superseded by the EL/UL44.
- the ECC40 dual triode, used in the frame and line time base oscillators, replacing the large and expensive UCH21.
- the EZ40 dual phase full wave supply rectifier. For this story the same holds as for the ECC40: a long career, but not in television sets. Cheap receivers would use a single EY/UY half wave rectifier, sets with full wave rectification mostly used the older but more powerful AZ50, which could handle as much current as three EZ40's.
- the EQ40 FM phi detector. This was clearly the most successful exercise of the RBL to get its reference designs adopted by the AL. In parallel to the RBL1 design the AL was working on the TX594U, their first FM receiver television set. However, the result - 6 valves - must have been considered disappointing, because the subsequent platform used the EQ40 design from the RBL. All details on the development and application of the EQ40 can be read here.
The main weakness of this design was the bad RF sensitivity, given that the antenna was directly connected to the hexode mixer input, with its intrinsically higher noise
The most interesting from this list is the ECC40 as used in time base oscillators. In the same EAB edition as on the Rimlock series and the EA40 an article by J. Jager of the RBL discusses this double triode in time base oscillators with linearisation for feedback. One of the possible implementations in this article for a frame time base oscillator uses a transformer for feedback in what is called an intermittent or "squegging" oscillator, and invention by - who else - Bert Dammers, published in EAB of April 1946. This circuit is exactly identical to the one in the RBL1 reference design. Despite the RBL pushing the ECC40 in this role, the Apparatenlab apparently didn't follow them because they would move to the UCH42 instead in a blocking oscillator arrangement. The ECC40 had much more success in the amplifier and radio application, where at this time my father was working on. See e.g. the amplifier reference design report from Bert Dammers and Piet Hooijmans shown here, where the ECC40 is used as phase inverter in the single-to-balanced converter of a balanced push pull power stage with two EL41's. An article on this was published in EAB of March 1949. The ECC40 had a long and successful career of 10 years, including its professional variant E80CC. Interestingly there never was a UCC40 version.
- RBL2
This schematic is originally of exactly the same date and authorization as RBL1, but updated 3-3-1949.
It clearly bears resemblance with the TX390 platform, using the new two-stage RF input without the ECH42. And it also copied the synchronization separator from that design, replacing the ECH21 by the much cheaper EF40 (which is the only use of this valve in any of the schematics). The power supply also copied the powerful AZ50, replacing the three EZ40 power supply rectifiers.
Both the frame and line time base oscillators are still based on the ECC40, although the frame time base oscillator has been replaced by a simpler and more classical blocking oscillator. Although in the EAB article of Jager the "squegging" oscillator was presented as an improvement of the blocking oscillators, practical considerations have apparently led to falling back on the older and simpler design.
- RBL3
This an undated and unsigned schematic.
It is a receiver using the MW22-14, dating it to the 2nd half of 1948. It is - with the exception of the EQ40 - entirely based on U-series valves and has indeed most in common with the contemporary 385U and TF402A executions of the TX390 platform. It seems an effort to design a TV with minimal number of valves - 15 - which makes it a typical RBL activity.
This was achieved by a number of design tricks: one UF42 IF amplifier less than normal; no sound IF amplifiers; the triode section of the UCH21 used as peak detector; no separate line time base oscillator and only one EY51 booster. It all seems a bit too much squeezed out, and I have some doubts whether this set would have functioned properly. However interesting, I have no further traces of its application.
Based on their activities the HIG Elektronenbuizen published a continuous stream of application articles in their Electronic Application Bulletin. Most of these were a combination of introducing a new (Rimlock) valve and circuit optimization. The table below gives the overview, which shows that all new valves in the core of the RBL television reference designs were covered with a dedicated article: the EA40, ECC40, EF42 and of course the EQ40. Interestingly articles are not only from the Eindhoven RBL, but also from Mullard (Mr. Coxall) and the new Paris Lab (Mr. Chambes).
Test equipment
Home-built television sets, 1948-1949
At this point we come to one of the most intriguing elements on this saga of early television development, and the original trigger for me diving into this: the home built television sets. As already explained, from March 1948 the Philips Experimentele Televisie (PET) was transmitting in Eindhoven, albeit for a very limited number of watchers. Originally some 20 SX861A research sets were handed out to dignitaries, towards the end of 1949 replaced or supplemented by some 150 TX594U's. As soon as the PET transmissions started amateurs all over the country started to build experimental home-built receivers, where it is not unlikely that quite some Philips engineers tried the same. Although it is so far not possible to trace back the decision, apparently the Philips management decided to allow some of its employees to build a television receiver at home, based on Philips components. There are strong indications this initiative originated from the Radiobuizen Lab, although it might later have allowed people from other organizations (Apparaten Lab and Research notably) to join. Piet Hooijmans, young RBL employee was one of them! Because the RBL1 schematic is the oldest in his files, I assume that is the one he started building on, which means the original set was built second half of 1948.
The home built activities were organized as follows. For efficiency reasons it was decided that everybody would work from the same reference designs; RBL1 as introduced above. Once an employee was allowed into the program he (there are no traces of she's in this story) would receive all material from Philips to build a TV according the design. This included, in order of material cost, all valves including the picture tube, the transformers and speaker, the passive components and the metal frame. Knowing the Philips culture, it was clearly not the intention that people worked on their TV during working hours, but after-work activities in the office were allowed. Most people - like my father -were unlikely to have all or any measurement equipment at home, and were thus forced to use the lab equipment. At least for Piet this shouldn't have been a problem, because he was still unmarried and - according to him - there was anyway nothing to do in post-war Eindhoven. The most complex part of the construction was the high voltage transformer, which was housed inside a metal can that was filled with oil (for isolation) and then soldered close. This was allowed to be done by the workshops during working hours. One interesting fact is the power supply transformer, number 7 in below picture. This is an extremely heavy component, in fact it creates quite some torsion in the entire set frame when lifted. This transformer was required in view of the 6,3V heater supply but also provided all other voltages. In Piet's notes it says "voedingstransformator (supply transformer) A3 161 21 app. SG860a" which suggests this is the same transformer as used in the SG860A receivers. An unexpected historical link!
The home built activities were organized as follows. For efficiency reasons it was decided that everybody would work from the same reference designs; RBL1 as introduced above. Once an employee was allowed into the program he (there are no traces of she's in this story) would receive all material from Philips to build a TV according the design. This included, in order of material cost, all valves including the picture tube, the transformers and speaker, the passive components and the metal frame. Knowing the Philips culture, it was clearly not the intention that people worked on their TV during working hours, but after-work activities in the office were allowed. Most people - like my father -were unlikely to have all or any measurement equipment at home, and were thus forced to use the lab equipment. At least for Piet this shouldn't have been a problem, because he was still unmarried and - according to him - there was anyway nothing to do in post-war Eindhoven. The most complex part of the construction was the high voltage transformer, which was housed inside a metal can that was filled with oil (for isolation) and then soldered close. This was allowed to be done by the workshops during working hours. One interesting fact is the power supply transformer, number 7 in below picture. This is an extremely heavy component, in fact it creates quite some torsion in the entire set frame when lifted. This transformer was required in view of the 6,3V heater supply but also provided all other voltages. In Piet's notes it says "voedingstransformator (supply transformer) A3 161 21 app. SG860a" which suggests this is the same transformer as used in the SG860A receivers. An unexpected historical link!
However, like so many activities started with the best intentions, also this one got out of hand. On March 2, 1949 Mr Alma, the head of the Radiobuizen Lab, issues below memorandum
Radiobuizen Lab 1
March 2, 1949 Announcement concerning the home building of television devices Lately, some drawbacks have become clear related to the do-it-yourself construction of television devices. A lot of working hours are spent on asking for and the giving of technical advice. To avoid these problems in the future, it has been agreed that from on this technical advice will only be provided at defined time slots by defined experts. The following gentlemen have declared themselves willing to act as so-called "television doctors": Dammers v.d. Knaap Uitjens Tuesday and Friday 17.00- 17.30 Huyser Cock Everyone participating in the do-it-yourself project can address any of these doctors at the prescribed times for advice. Furthermore it seems desirable to limit the period allowed for the construction of a device, e.g. half a year. Only in exceptional cases it will be allowed to deviate from this, e.g. due to problems in component supply or illness. Because the NV [Philips] has already supplied a considerable amount of material for the home built televisions, from now on, both for those already in the program but need new components for an extension, as well as for those who will start for the first time, permission will be required from undersigned. Furthermore we beg the do-it-yourself people for considering not to disturb the workshops for trivialities like bolts and wires. In general, from now on no longer materials will be supplied for the construction of antennas, this will be limited to giving advice. G. Alma |
Draconic measures! The distribution list contains 36 names, including a number of managers. Although the majority has not been identified, they seem mostly from the RBL Fifth name from the bottom is NatLab group leader Haantjes, which might suggest some four researchers had joined the program. Al in all it seems some 25 people were already participating in the do-it-yourself television program. Including Piet Hooijmans on the fourth line (here erroneously written as Hooymans).
But apparently the first round of measures was not sufficient to get a grip on the program, because two months later Alma issued a second memo:
But apparently the first round of measures was not sufficient to get a grip on the program, because two months later Alma issued a second memo:
Radiobuizen Lab 1
May 11, 1949 Dr.A/EM Additional announcement concerning the do-it-yourself construction of television devices.
Eindhoven, May 11, 1949 G. Alma |
It is beyond the scope of this page to dive into the details of the home built TV. In any case Piet Hooijmans finished its construction and got it all working, most probably towards the end of 1948. But he had it working and was allowed to take it home, where he invited two of his sisters to come over and watch the PET transmissions. When he left the Radiobuizen Lab early 1950 he was apparently allowed to keep it, whether he had to pay money as per point 5. of the last memo I don't know. But 67 years later the set is still in my possession.
What happened further with the program I don't know. But given the memo's it is not hard to imagine that it didn't live too long, and was stopped ultimately the introduction of operational TV reception in 1951. |
References
See part 2.
Update history
|
|
- First upload July 2017
- August 2017
Added section on pre-war and immediate post-war UK sets as bridge to the SG860/SX861.
Re-written and extended the SX861 section based on all inputs from Jac Janssen.
Update block diagrams with some technical details (RF and IF frequencies, valve and semiconductor count).
Added table of content per page with clickable links to the chapters.
Added some nice pictures. - February 2019
I have come to the conclusion that for explaining the post-war developments it is necessary to understand the pre-war TV activities. After quite some extra research I've thus been able to re-write the pre-war section. As always many inputs from Jac Janssen.
Based on extensive analysis of the 1946-1949 post war sets and discussions with Jac, I have re-written these sections too, with a much more logical succession of the different sets and their inter-relation. Also corrected many errors related to valves used, IF frequencies, etcetera, so almost all TV block diagrams have been updated.
As a consequence I've given this chapter the new sub-title "1936-1949".
Many pictures added. - June 2019
Thanks to the site I was contacted by Edvard Paling, who's father Ton Paling started working on TV development at the NatLab in 1942. Edvard is also the owner of a (cannibalized) SX861A, but most interestingly also possesses a unique set of documents (circuit and assembly diagrams, parts lists) of the SG860A and SX861A, as well as the report in French promoting the 567-line standard and containing beautiful pictures of the Natlab SG860A prototype. His papers also gave the very first and so far unique confirmation of the 1947 "console direct zicht" receiver, of which Jac has a unique surviving example, which we've provisionally baptized the TX660A. Detailed analyses of this new data, together with Jac Janssen, has allowed me to further refine the sections on the SG860A-SX861A-TX660A sets. - November 2019
Have added interesting new details on the 1936 Philips demos at the Berlin and London radio shows, based on articles in Wireless World from that year, I was pointed at by Peter Scott (who also has a nice page on pre-war TV).
Have added a few interesting pictures of the 405-line 492U which were shared on the UK Vintage Radio Repair forum. - March 2020
Tonino Giagnacovo from Rome, Italy, sent me some very interesting articles from the Italian magazine Radio Industria in 1939 and 1940. These contain the first detailed description of the 2400 TV family, the first direct view production chassis of Philips. This has allowed me to completely re-write a new section dedicated to this chassis. As a bonus he also included pictures of the early production of these sets in Monza.
Have corrected the naming for the pre-1940 camera-valves into Iconoscope (I had used Ionoscope). - March 2021
As already explained in the text, I was contacted, through the site, by Taco Vonk, who supervises the Harry de Winter radio and tV collection. He told me has a number of vintage Philips TVs, includingthe unique 180-line set from the formerly Swiss MJR museum, and offered me to come and have a look. An invitation I eagerly accepted. It was great to be able to photograph both the 180-line set and the 563, both in perfect condition, plus more sets mentioned in part 2. It has allowed me to completely re-write the (new and dedicated) section on the 1935 180-line set, as well as that on the 1936 405-line set. Including many detailed pictures. So also this part of the story is now really having substantial content and has moved far beyond the single picture without any details. - November 2022
I was contacted by Gerolf Poetschke, who pointed me at some very interesting news clips in Austrian newspapers and trade magazines, which claify the background of the very first C.F.H. Müller/Philips television set from 1935. Via Gerolf I also received a vague yet unique picture of a French version of the 1939 Tel61 TV.
Guido Nijs sent me intersting copies of Philips television demonstrations in Belgium in 1928, and 19378.
These newspaper clippings then triggered me to do the same analysis in the Dutch Delpher old newspaper archive, which I have scanned for all Philips television activities between 1934 and 1939. This delivered quite an amount of good data, since the early TV developments received a lot of newspaper attention. This has allowed me to re-write the sections on the pre-war Philips television developments and add much more details and accurate dates. It also includes more information on the very first picture tube and iconoscope developments.
I have then contacted Jan de Vries, who has worked his whole life in the Hilversum TV studios and vans, who has triggered me to re-analyse the 1937-38 Philips Television Caravans that toured through Europe.
Jac Janssen as always provided further data and nice pictures.
All in all a major upgrade of the pre-war part of this chapter. - November 2023
Patrik Schindler pointed me at an error in one of the captions on the Rimlock valve introduction, which has been corrected.